IntenseDebate - wedeclare

12 years ago @ Hoosier Access - Libertarians, primarie... · 0 replies · +3 points

Scott, I appreciate your tone in this, but you sure missed the whole point of my post.
What is your answer to the question you quoted? And how's your way been working for the past ONE HUNDRED YEARS?
I hate to be fussy about this, but it's important for people to understand exactly what they're choosing with their predictable, obedient, loyal "attaboy" votes to the Powers That Be. And it's important that y'all start taking accountability for your choice instead of copping-out to "odds" and "wasted vote" canards.
You already have what you've been choosing. Do you like it?
Here's more from that post:
"I'd rather purge even the good ones like Rand Paul and Justin Amash in order to clean house than leave any of this cancer in place.
We're not talking about firing just the politicians, are we?
I hope we're ready to admit that the whole corrupt system, from the Precinct Committeeman who gets special business deals because he's "politically connected," to the K-Street lobbyists, to the military industrialists and the moneychangers who own them...it all has to go.
And what is that nasty den of vipers called in modern parlance? The Two Party System."

14 years ago @ Vision to America - Santorum Says to Vote ... · 0 replies · +5 points

Sheesh. That article is hardly impartial. It's also filled with a lot of hooie.
I wish we'd quit calling each other crazy and start listening instead. We really must find a way to make all the ungoverned violence and theft we call "government" work out somehow.

14 years ago @ Vision to America - Santorum Says to Vote ... · 0 replies · +7 points

It's a choice. We have so far said "attaboy" with our votes to everybody involved with Agenda 21.
I suggest we stop choosing it.
It's fact only if we make it so.
We don't have what we want, you know...we have what we choose.

14 years ago @ Vision to America - Santorum Says to Vote ... · 0 replies · +4 points

"...Both houses on your platform?" What platform?
This isn't about abstractions like parties and houses. This is about you and your choices.
How do you want to live?
Are we to obey rules/who is to obey rules?
Ron Paul is the only candidate so far who's got rules written down. What's even better than the fact that they're already the Law of the Land is that these rules are few enough to know, simple enough to understand, and important enough that every one of them is to be obeyed (by everybody) all the time.
That's worth voting for.
Heck; that's worth fighting for.

14 years ago @ Vision to America - Santorum Says to Vote ... · 0 replies · +3 points

Yeah ...We should censor them; taser them; imprison and then shoot them.

14 years ago @ Vision to America - Santorum Says to Vote ... · 3 replies · +3 points

I've agreed to everything you've said so far ...but "Ducky" is a rather dumb name for somebody who seems very smart.

14 years ago @ Vision to America - Santorum Says to Vote ... · 2 replies · +2 points

I think Santorum is vying with Newt for the most two-faced among the candidates. And he's competing with Romney for the Big Government Guy prize. Ron Paul is my guy.
But...
We don't know if the guy asking the questions was wearing a Ron Paul T-Shirt, or otherwise stamped as an RP supporter.
I think Santorum is a horrible candidate. But c'mon...it's hard to say this is fair.

14 years ago @ Vision to America - "Jews for Ron Paul" to... · 0 replies · 0 points

Ben, I was going mostly on "his attitudes towards Jews and America's conduct are decidedly negative." Maybe I misinterpreted that as approval of our foreign policy?
I don't waste my vote on the status quo/banker parties anymore. I've met an awful lot of the political power players, and have found the same rich, corrupt people behind the curtains of both Democratic and Republican parties.
Voting for them is stupid, in my opinion, as I'm opposed to their robbing Peter to pay Paul scam. It's all special deals for special people, and you and I are not the special people. We are Petered by Paul.
But because most people don't research their options, and in fact have no idea that there are always (always) non-demorepublicrat candidates on the ballot (see http://horningforsenate.com), I've not voted for anybody who's actually won in over twenty years.
Here's my annotated copy of the US Constitution (it's pretty much what I'm all about): http://lpin.org/files/2011/12/THE-UNITED-STATES-C...

14 years ago @ Vision to America - "Jews for Ron Paul" to... · 3 replies · +2 points

I likely very strongly disagree with you on foreign policy, but you made your point rationally, and that's just plain refreshing. Thanks. For me, I can't support any entrenched/corrupt/crony party candidate anymore (do we really fail to see the problem with a system that's far bigger and more entangling than any candidate can handle?). If Dr. No bails for a third party run, then maybe he'd have my support. But I do admit that Ron Paul has a way of saying things that are factually correct in the worst possible way. Sometimes he comes off very badly. And yes, twenty years ago he associated himself with some racist comments. Those who know him say he's not at all a racist. I've met him on several occasions, and find it hard to imagine he's a racist. But I believe he's stone cold right about bankster/moneychangers, the constitutional rule of law we've thrown away, and our absolutely deadly stupid, costly, counterproductive foreign policy.

15 years ago @ Expose Obama - Oil Spill: The Video O... · 0 replies · -1 points

"...culture of deregulation?!?!?" Where?
We've got 3000 pages of new regulations every minute, as far as I can tell. And corporations have always been political entities, not business entities. In fact the whole point of incorporation is to grant politically connected people immunity from free market accountability.
We should know this by now, dear voters.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with wedeclare

People I'm following

wedeclare