"...no marauding gangs of black teenagers went around killing white people after he spoke..."

Quite right. Marauding gangs of blacks that go around beating, robbing and raping white people: yes, of course, more and more each year. But killing them? Rarely.

Unamused here (proud member of the A3P) to note that besides those very professional-looking flyers by a guest poster, I also have two rather crude flyers of my own that are relevant here: one on the July 3 mob in Milwaukee, WI and one on the beating of Carter Strange in Columbia, SC.

I interpret his (or her) post this way: here's one more thing some of us can do, to capture an otherwise unreceptive audience.

He doesn't want you or I to stop what we're doing — which is just as well, because I never will. We are reaching people — a certain kind of people. He wants the movement, such as it is, or elements of the movement, to direct their energy in another direction as well.

For his "typical white people," I read "typical liberal white people," or "SWPL-type white people."

I agree with VA about the civil rights movement and violence, and about the failure of white pride groups. But I do not believe that flyers/leaflets of the kind of the guest poster is proposing have prompted or will prompt such shrill headlines. I wish they would! That would discredit our opponents more than it would us.

It works for links and images.