~“Hitler and the Nazis were inspired by Islam,”~

Ishaq:240 "The Jews are a nation of liars.... The Jews are a treacherous, lying, and evil people."

Qur'an 33:26 "Allah made the Jews leave their homes by terrorizing them so that you killed some and made many captive. And He made you inherit their lands, their homes, and their wealth. He gave you a country you had not traversed before."

Qur'an 59:14 "The Jews are devoid of sense. There is a grievous punishment awaiting them. Satan tells them not to believe so they will end up in Hell."

Qur'an 4:55 "Sufficient for the Jew is the Flaming Fire!"

Gee, I wonder where the Nazis got those ideas? Hey, Ibrahim Hooper, is this what you call "Islamophobia", or am I just "misquoting" Islamic texts? Islam IS EVIL. Any questions?

A couple of observations:
1.) It's been done before: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_iH1GhM2j8
and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daOHSxxb9ug

2.) They were safe.
These brave young people of the IDF live with the crazies of Hamas, al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades and Hizbollah on a daily basis. There is no "letting your guard down", for they know that if they did they'd endanger not only themselves but Israeli civilians as well, which is absolutely unacceptable. Take my word for it, I'd guarantee they OWNED that alley.

3.) It's why they fight.
Fo those of you who haven't boned up on the writings about Islam, here's the quote:

Bukhari:V7B69N494 "I heard the Prophet saying, 'From among my followers there will be some who will consider illegal sexual intercourse, the wearing of silk, the drinking of alcoholic drinks and the use of musical instruments, to be lawful. Allah will destroy them during the night and will let mountains fall on them. He will transform the rest into monkeys and pigs and they will remain so till the Day of Doom.'"

Regardless how some in Islam wish to "repaint" this hadith, it is of and by itself very clear. The use of musical instruments is unlawful, (haram).
So I say let them dance. Their little "busta' move" is a) in a long tradition of soldiers and b) a blow against the religion of terrorists.

What the heck does INTERPOL need my help for? Barack Hussein Obama gave them carte blanche to operate in the US anyway. (See Executive Order 12425 and EO 13534.) Folks, guess what? They're already here...

The only thing that is regrettable here is that the Mexican police/army were not present to keep their hooligan citizens from engaging in crime. The fact that they ended up pointing their weapons at Border agents must mean that they cannot tell the difference between rock-throwing Mexicans and Americans in uniform. It happens to them all the time. They can't seem to find cartel thugs carrying AK-47s either.

Very interesting write-up from the left. I guess liberals elites need someone to "sort out that Breibart fellow" for them. It's probably a bit of a challenge to have them go to his websites and make a determination on their own. The first rule in the liberal mindset is to not expose oneself to any ideas that challenge the ideology.

Andrew is a pugilist first and a theoretician second. That's not a knock on his theorizing, it's a comment on the fact that he hates to miss a good fight. I enjoy his sense of outrage.

Mr Kantor, although I find what you say well intentioned, I do not believe you, or just about any of your colleagues understand the job before you. What the federal budget needs is not trimming, it's amputation. HUD and the Dept. of Education should be first. If you enact a fair tax 90% of the IRS can go away. Audit the Federal Reserve with former IRS employees. Why are we paying farm subsidies at all? Why is not natural gas the transportation fuel of the land? That alone would repatriate $40 - $60 billion a MONTH. How about a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution? If Social security is such a great idea, why are government employees and legislators exempt? Are you getting the picture?

From reading the comments I see the indignation. But in our outrage we're missing the greater lesson. We're missing, if you will, the greater outrage. All of the staff involved with this at KPHO all went to college to come out with a degree in Journalism. I would venture that none of them is much over thirty, maybe (but I doubt it), forty years old. Why? Because KPHO is too cheap to pay experienced, veteran journalists, not when true journalism is second to disseminating ideology. What ideology? The ideology that "no one is to blame". Hence the spin of the original video into the poor, dead-of-night "undocumenteds", poster children for moral equivalency.

As we all know, college campuses in general and Journalism departments in particular are havens for progressive socialist thought, manifested in a moral equivalency that says it is okay to disregard things like objectivity and moral constraints to serve the perceived greater responsibility of moving "social justice" forward. These little kiddies with their diplomas don't know the five "W"s, the ten commandments, (thou shall not steal), or the basic, golden rule of journalism. YOU must, absolutely, positively have CORROBORATION of your primary source. What if BIP had FAKED the videos? How did KPHO know PIB hadn't? Answer is, they didn't, but it didn't matter. Why fool with doing your job by the book when you're stealing content anyway?

So let's sum it up. The KPHO reporters are morally bankrupt. Their producer, ditto. The station management and owners, likewise only more so. If you think not, why haven't the owners of KPHO come out and publicly announced the firing of everyone involved? Why hasn't the network yanked their affiliate license? Where are their college professors bemoaning the shame and humiliation that one of their former students was involved in such a travesty and befoulment of their honored and respected trade? There isn't going to be, because the whole concept of moral equivalency is already here. No one is to blame.
Theosebes Goodfellow