Ginger Taylor

Ginger Taylor

59p

106 comments posted · 0 followers · following 1

15 years ago @ Big Government - Reason.tv: Richard Eps... · 0 replies · +7 points

"You cannot stop the blunders of one government program with putting another one on top."

It was such a good comment I just wanted to repeat it.

15 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Jenny McCarthy: When C... · 0 replies · +1 points

Why would Pharma pay me to expose their dirty little secrets exactly?

I have been told that you take Pharma money. If that is incorrect, then it is incorrect. Just looking for your stated position on that. So just to get things straight... you have not received any payments from pharmaceutical companies? You are denying that here and now, right?

I am really just looking for you to deny it here, rather than saying you have denied it elsewhere. For the record.

15 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Jenny McCarthy: When C... · 3 replies · 0 points

Now... I have shown you mine, now you show me yours.

Where can I find you list of potential conflicts of interest?

Also, can you point me to something that might actually show or state that you are a conservative?

15 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Jenny McCarthy: When C... · 1 reply · 0 points

Having advertisers is not shilling! It is astonishing that you are a troll ON YOUR OWN BLOG POST!

Dana, are you a shill for the atheistic, conservative hating "skeptic" community?

You still have not disclosed your conflicts of interest.

15 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Jenny McCarthy: When C... · 0 replies · 0 points

Great! finally a direct answer to the question.

Can you point me toward these denials, or background on the story or you disclosure of conflicts of interest so I can sort out exactly what the facts are here?

15 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Jenny McCarthy: When C... · 0 replies · 0 points

Dana,

Do you know what a shill is? It is someone who is being paid to hype something, but poses as an objective third party. It is the guy who stands in the audience and says, "why that sounds like an amazing product, I will take 20!" Then splits the profits with the vendor.

So by denfinition, one who disclosed any and all, even POTENTIAL conflicts of interest cannot be a shill then, can they.

So NO I am not a shill for anyone.

AOA is not a "shill" as you can see who their advertisers and sponsors are by looking at their page.

So is Big Hollywood a "shill" for everyone in the right hand column here? No... it is called "advertising".

You know what I LOVE about Andrew Breitbart? That he is out and proud. He feels no need to hide any of his opinions or afilliations. I am of that school and will continue to add to my disclosures so that anyone can track who I am associated with.

And I love how you have demonized Age of Autism with out ever making an accusation against the blog. Ain't nothin' wrong with Age of Autism or Silsby or Generation Rescue, and asking the question like that, in a forum where no one has heard of these groups before, is just trying to smear them by making it sound like they are somehow dubious. I am sure if you could you would have put spooky music behind them and written their names in dripping blood.

You are truly the queen of Ad Hominem attacks and guilt by inference of guilt.

AOA has probably exposed as much government corruption as Big Government has, but then again... I forgot...you trust the Obama administration and Kathleen Sebelius. Which again leads me to wonder how you are getting published on the Bigs with your 'Blindly trust the government' message. Baffling.

WHY ARE THE BIGS PUBLISHING THIS LIBERAL JUNK!

15 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Jenny McCarthy: When C... · 5 replies · 0 points

Do you deny it ANB? Do you take undisclosed profits from Pharma? I think I have asked you this question half a dozen times in various forums. And you have never answered. The shill accusation is quite over used, but I have heard from reputable sources that you get Pharma funding and do not disclose it.

So if that is incorrect, please correct the record here. Do you?

15 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Jenny McCarthy: When C... · 0 replies · +1 points

You are making my case for me. OD a child on vaccines, cause in damage, and you have a psych drug user for life.

CDC's own studies show that the mercury in vaccines causes attention deficit and delays in some. How many billion dollars in Ritalin do you think that has generated in the last 40 years?

Vaccine profits are one thing, vaccine damage profits are almost incalculable.

15 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Jenny McCarthy: When C... · 0 replies · +1 points

A child with autism costs around 3 million dollars to care for during their lifetime, with severe cases coming in at around 10 million. And that dies not include lost wages and work that they would be contributing to society.

One percent of American children are diagnosed with autism.

Do those numbers not knock you on your butt? Do you realize that YOU are paying for that? 35 BILLION dollars last year to pay for our kids.

So NOW is it absolutely vital to you to find out if the vaccine program is doing this and to quit publishing sleazy hit pieces on Jenny McCarthy and find out how to stop the autism epidemic?

15 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Jenny McCarthy: When C... · 8 replies · 0 points

Dana, Offit's deceptions, hidden conflicts of interest, and flat out lies have been documented for years.

I have been one of the people documenting them. If you would like to spend a few hours reading about it, you can find information on it here: http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.com/search/lab...

Offit says that a baby can get 100,000 vaccines safely in one sitting. Offit says that he was never reprimanded by congress for his conflicts of interest. Offit had to pay Jenny McCarthy $5,000 for lying about the head of her non-profit organization in his book. Paul Offit almost never tells people that his vaccine patents have made him millions, and that if the vaccine program is paired down the first vaccine to get pulled from the schedule will be his Rotavirus vaccine (which contains two rogue viruses that cause wasting disease in pigs) which will loose him TENS OF MILLIONS in future profits. Offit has talked himself into such a corner that he and his "Autism Science Foundation" is now telling people that Hannah Poling had brain damage before she was vaccinated. Total lie. At 16 months old, Hannah was so bright and so verbal that she was chosen to be a "typical peer" in a program for developmentally disabled children. He has been publicly chastised by Hannah Poling's lawyer/nurse mother for lying about her daughter.

Paul Offit does not practice medicine... he has no patients at all... and has never, never treated a child with autism. He is a vaccine industry spokesperson. He admitted in his home town newspaper that he is a "vaccine salesman" He is Merck's boy.

Do you need me to cite all this so you can do your own investigating?

Why exactly do you like him and believe that he is trustworthy?

Unlike Dr. Offit, I open disclose all my potential conflicts of interest, so that readers can make up their minds for themselves how objective I am. I even list people that I am just friends with, but have not financially profited from.
http://www.blogger.com/profile/042002866257350784...

Where can I find you list of potential conflicts of interest?