She. Read your AP style guide or look at GLAAD's.

Why did you leave out the fact that the school did it's own investigation and found that no harassment had take place?

Why did you leave out the the Florence PD investigated, but dropped the case after PJI advised the parents to make no statements under oath?

Why did you leave out the fact that these policy suggestions weren't "recent?" PJI submitted those "suggestions" almost 2 months ago. This is just PJI hype that you're helping to inflate. Stop it.

Shame on you.

To be clear, Clemenson verified that the other speaker was also part of the group organized via the out-of-town Tea Party club. It's therefore very likely that the 3rd wasn't a parent of a child in the district either. I just couldn't verify much about her, so I didn't comment on her.

I'd love to learn more about how the notion that Clemenson, et al were all parents of local school children became such a prominent theme of this article.

This is so silly. These policies have been on the books in places like TEXAS for years and all that's happened is that trans kids got to go to school without worrying about institutionalized bigotry.

Ask yourself why none of these stories ever mentions that Cali-style policy protecting trans kids has already been enacted throughout the nation - for years - without incident? All this nonsensical fear mongering just so some bigots can harm trans kids is kinda sad.

Wow... She sounds like a H-BSer :/

Are you actually asserting that nobody has an innate subjective sense of their own physical sex? Ya, know... a gender orientation? How... John Money of you.

More on ciswashing of queer history:
http://www.transadvocate.com/so-what-was-stonewal...

She backed out and then threatened to call teh internets police on me unless I agreed to never, ever, EVER, NEVERRRRR(!!!!!!!) again note that she started the drama, backed out of the debate by pretending that she wasn't able to contact me and/or that somehow she didn't know when the debate would be (even though I had posted a live countdown-to-debate on my site and sent her the info).

Here's the threat wherein she states she's going to report me to a Texas agency that deals with housing discrimination... and that she was going to contact Annise and get her to set me straight.
http://www.cristanwilliams.com/b/2012/07/02/dun-g...

Lisa really believes that "transgender" is a communist plot. This and folks like Jennifer Usher and Ashley Love are what's left of the TS Seps. BTW, a YEAR ago she announced that she was about to publish a rebuttal to my research that would destroy my research and prove the TS Sep history correct.

Aaannd... I'm still waiting for the rebuttal. At this point I'm starting to suspect that she simply doesn't know what she's talking about and that maybe her assertions are not actually based in reality.

I keep hoping that she'll have a moment of clarity and snap out of it. She has so much misguided passion... the problem is that she's spreading and legitimizing the very RadFem dogma they've used against all trans folk... except Love is focusing that RadFem BS on non-transsexual trans folk.

"I do not think that transvestites should use the women's restroom just because they have decided to dress up in women's clothing." - Ashley Love, Friday, January 22, 2010

RadFems used that same argument to marginalize Sylvia Rivera:

[Women in the GLF were uncomfortable referring to Rivera—who insisted in using women’s bathrooms, even in City hall—as “she.” Pressure mounted. The year 1973 witnessed clash that would take Rivera out of the movement for the next two decades. Her lifelong friend and fellow Stonewall Veteran Bob Kohler recalled, “Sylvia left the movement because after the first three or four years, she was denied a right to speak.” It was during the Pride rally in Washington Square Park after the Christopher Street Liberation Day March.

To the dismay of Lesbian Feminist Liberation drag queens were scheduled to perform. As they passed out flyers outlining their opposition to the “female impersonators,” Rivera wrestled for the microphone held by emcee Vitto Russo, before getting hit with it herself. Rivera explained, “I had to battle my way up on stage, and literally get beaten up and punched around by people I thought were my comrades, to get to that microphone. I got to the microphone and I said my piece.” Rivera complained that the middle-class crowd cared little to nothing about the continued harassment and arrests of street drag queens. Bleeding, Rivera sang, “You Gotta Have Friends,” screamed “Revolution Now!” and led the crowd in a chant of “Give me a G, Give me an A, Give me a Y…What does it spell?” Barely audible, her voice breaking, “GAY POWER,” she groaned.]

- Benjamin Shepard, “Sylvia and Sylvia’s Children: The Battle for a Queer Public Space,” That’s Revolting! (ed. Matt Bernstein Sycamore)

Love is completely unaware (or willfully blind) that RadFems are why we trans folk lost our healthcare in the first place. Instead of simply investigating the facts, she seems to blindly assume that we lost our healthcare in the 1980s because of non-transsexual trans folk. If she would just do a little damn research she would learn that it was a RadFem brief that the Reagan Administration used to justify removing trans care from Medicare... which the states then used to remove trans care from Medicaid... which the private insurance companies then, following the government's example, removed trans care. Love just doesn't/won't get the truth:

[So forgive us people with transsexualism when we get a little feisty and resistant against Gay Inc and it's Transgender Subsidiary using their big platform to spread misinformation that harms people with transsexualism, their medical legitimacy, health care rights and narrative!] - Ashley Love, Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Thanks!