DeHavelle
48p
18 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
13 years ago @ Full Time Ink - This rain is as plain ... · 0 replies · +1 points
I hadn't thought about an extra-limbs scenario for humans, though I've long believed that four walking legs plus two arms is an ideal configuration for a sentient creature.
13 years ago @ Full Time Ink - This rain is as plain ... · 2 replies · +1 points
In microgravity, such as in orbit, this sense has to be retrained, as it costs little or no muscle tension to hold an arm in position.
In order to create a truly natural-feeling artificial limb, this sense (with feedback to the brain) has to be supported as well.
But there's nothing in principle that says that a Kyra-like electroception couldn't be wired up to feed to the brain. We've already done work to feed a mouse cursor's position in directly, and that's not a sense that people normally have.
Artificial proprioception has been successfully field tested in stroke victims with success.
A number of creatures, not all in water, sense magnetic fields. This is usually done with tiny magnetic metal particles inside the cell itself, generally involved in navigation.
Many plants directly sense gravity. Octopuses have an extraordinarily developed sense of up and down and acceleration, but interestingly only a poor proprioception sense, we think. Perhaps the flexible arms are too much for the central octopus brain to keep track of, and each arm has its own brain tissue in any event.
We can eventually augment or create almost any sense and feed it in to a human brain. Imagine having a "feeling" that your most recent thought gets a lot of Google hits.
So Kyra shouldn't give up on humans, even though it will take some artificial tinkering. After all, she is herself (apparently) the result of human tinkering, demonstrating that it can have good results. Or at least impressive results, depending upon one's notion of "good."
I'm enjoying your work, and imagining that Kyra is for some folks a sort of therapod therapy.
Best wishes!
14 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Follow the Yellow Bric... · 0 replies · +1 points
The "Oz is political" debate is peculiar. The early productions of the book as a stage play (which Baum was involved in) often simply used the politicians' names in speeches of the characters.
The political retelling was "rediscovered" relatively recently — and now the argument used to suggest that Baum was really for McKinley was the fact that he wrote a poem that seemed to be rooting for McKinley. Modern readers don't realize that this satirical poem "When McKinley Gets the Chair" came out right as the notion of executing criminals with the electric chair became the new Progressive style:
This is about that poem: http://level-head.livejournal.com/468432.html
And this is about Bryan, the only man to run against himself for President. He lost: http://level-head.livejournal.com/467780.html
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
14 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Follow the Yellow Bric... · 0 replies · +1 points
The political retelling was "rediscovered" relatively recently — and now the argument used to suggest that Baum was really for McKinley was the fact that he wrote a poem that seemed to be rooting for McKinley. Modern readers don't realize that this satirical poem "When McKinley Gets the Chair" came out right as the notion of executing criminals with the electric chair became the new Progressive style:
This is about that poem: http://level-head.livejournal.com/468432.html
And this is about Bryan, the only man to run against himself for President. He lost: http://level-head.livejournal.com/467780.html
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
14 years ago @ Big Hollywood - On Reagan's Birthday, ... · 0 replies · +1 points
14 years ago @ http://www.bluecollarp... - Jules Manson Calls For... · 0 replies · +1 points
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
14 years ago @ http://www.bluecollarp... - Jules Manson Calls For... · 1 reply · +1 points
His positions are an odd mix; he seems as good or better a fit with the Occupy movement. But in any event, the "Tea Party Leader" and "Tea Party darling" and "Republican politician" statements are all evidently fabrications.
It would be good to deal with the facts as they are, especially as this fellow could be as easily portrayed on one side of the aisle as the other. There are not too many militant, anti-Christian ranters in the Tea Party, for example, but Manson's posts at SupportAtheism contain that sentiment.
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
14 years ago @ Breitbart.tv - Newt Flashback 2003: I... · 0 replies · -1 points
That he'd put on those Socialist clothes
He wanted regs and IT
While these things aren't for free
They are smart. That's as far as he goes
Note that Romney, Obama, and Hill
Made us swallow the still-bitter pill
Of us paying for millions
Who'd soon cost us trillions
This is what Newt has promised to kill
But a system for tracking the data
And the role of healthcare regulator
Isn't foolish or dead
There's some place for the Fed
(Though the info we'll talk about later...)
14 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Kyle Smith: 'Things Ta... · 1 reply · +10 points
Our friends on the left saw the trash scenes and jumped to Global Warming (despite the movie showing no rise in sea level), but the actual story was far more interesting.
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle
14 years ago @
Big Government -
Hmm. To keep it fair, we need to look carefully at this. I expect that this is what the investigative report will accomplish.
For example, if in fact Bachus checked with the ethics committee and got clearance before embarking upon his financial dalliances, or we learn that this was a long-accepted practice by the committee, then our ire really needs to be focused on understanding why it's considered acceptable, and changing it as (is almost certainly) appropriate.
It certainly looks terrible from here, and I'm reminded a bit of the British MP expense-padding scheme revealed last year. That was winked at, but not officially accepted — and a lot of the bums were thrown out.
This trading may be officially accepted! And if so, we would start by reviewing, and probably throwing out, the ethics committee and starting that process over from scratch.
The big question: How do we create a system that incentivizes good behavior? Our current scheme, unfortunately, tempts even good people to play along, and many of them are far from good people.
===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle