DeHavelle

DeHavelle

49p

16 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

14 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Follow the Yellow Bric... · 0 replies · +1 points

The political aspects of this story have long fascinated me, and I am looking forward to your presentation.

The "Oz is political" debate is peculiar. The early productions of the book as a stage play (which Baum was involved in) often simply used the politicians' names in speeches of the characters.

The political retelling was "rediscovered" relatively recently — and now the argument used to suggest that Baum was really for McKinley was the fact that he wrote a poem that seemed to be rooting for McKinley. Modern readers don't realize that this satirical poem "When McKinley Gets the Chair" came out right as the notion of executing criminals with the electric chair became the new Progressive style:

This is about that poem: http://level-head.livejournal.com/468432.html

And this is about Bryan, the only man to run against himself for President. He lost: http://level-head.livejournal.com/467780.html

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle

14 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Follow the Yellow Bric... · 0 replies · +1 points

Not true. In fact, the early productions of the book as a stage play (which he was involved in) often simply used the politicians' names in speeches of the characters.

The political retelling was "rediscovered" relatively recently — and now the argument used to suggest that Baum was really for McKinley was the fact that he wrote a poem that seemed to be rooting for McKinley. Modern readers don't realize that this satirical poem "When McKinley Gets the Chair" came out right as the notion of executing criminals with the electric chair became the new Progressive style:

This is about that poem: http://level-head.livejournal.com/468432.html

And this is about Bryan, the only man to run against himself for President. He lost: http://level-head.livejournal.com/467780.html

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle

15 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - On Reagan's Birthday, ... · 0 replies · +1 points

The Iran Contra affair does not trouble me. I've looked into it extensively, and while it was somewhat mishandled by the administration, it was not illegal, simply covert. The Boland amendments violations did not convict Col. North, it was a minor issue over the security system installed to protect his family. That conviction was later vacated, and Congress looked foolish indeed pursuing this.

22 weeks ago @ http://www.bluecollarp... - Jules Manson Calls For... · 0 replies · +1 points

I put up a couple of posts about the fellow, with some links to background: http://www.dehavelle.com/2011/12/follow-up-on-jul... http://www.dehavelle.com/2011/12/evolution-of-a-p...

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle

22 weeks ago @ http://www.bluecollarp... - Jules Manson Calls For... · 1 reply · +1 points

Jules Manson is an atheist libertarian who apparently despised the Tea Party. He was removed as editor of SupportAtheism.org because of a racist private comment, according to the current editor of that website. He is apparently a "9/11 Truth" conspiracy enthusiast, he officially favors rent and price controls on his web page, and he says that he dislikes both main political parties but has been a member of both. He was (he says) motivated to run for "office" (the town's City Council) because his landlord raised the rent on his trailer, among other things.

His positions are an odd mix; he seems as good or better a fit with the Occupy movement. But in any event, the "Tea Party Leader" and "Tea Party darling" and "Republican politician" statements are all evidently fabrications.

It would be good to deal with the facts as they are, especially as this fellow could be as easily portrayed on one side of the aisle as the other. There are not too many militant, anti-Christian ranters in the Tea Party, for example, but Manson's posts at SupportAtheism contain that sentiment.

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle

24 weeks ago @ Breitbart.tv - Newt Flashback 2003: I... · 0 replies · -1 points

Well, Newt Gingrich here didn't propose
That he'd put on those Socialist clothes
He wanted regs and IT
While these things aren't for free
They are smart. That's as far as he goes

Note that Romney, Obama, and Hill
Made us swallow the still-bitter pill
Of us paying for millions
Who'd soon cost us trillions
This is what Newt has promised to kill

But a system for tracking the data
And the role of healthcare regulator
Isn't foolish or dead
There's some place for the Fed
(Though the info we'll talk about later...)

27 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Kyle Smith: 'Things Ta... · 1 reply · +10 points

WALL•E's "message": Government nanny-states dehumanize us all — and it's time to go back to working for a living, faming, and building cities. Not too bad a message, actually.

Our friends on the left saw the trash scenes and jumped to Global Warming (despite the movie showing no rise in sea level), but the actual story was far more interesting.

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle

45 weeks ago @ TEA in Space - A Quick Note On STS-135 · 0 replies · +3 points

I was on your side many years ago, before the Tea Party in Space was conceived.

While the vapor trail from Columbia's ill-fated last re-entry still hung in the sky over my office, I walked inside and wrote this:

Push On!

The Shuttle, the Columbia, is lost
The world is shocked, and frozen now in place
Already timid souls bemoan the cost
And feel we should not once more challenge space

Debris will be discovered, gathered, probed
And theories will spark, then burst in flame
Though causes might not ever be disrobed
Too many will just search for who's to blame

The seven lost this February morn
Of many countries scattered 'round the Earth,
Would wish to see our spirit now reborn
And keep exploring—go for all we're worth!

The NASA Shuttle program has been stopped
It may be years before we can advance
But we can't let this ball be simply dropped!
For future's sake, we have to take the chance

The veterans Husband, Chawla, Anderson,
And rookies Brown, Ramon, McCool and Clark
Add their names to the journey just begun
And for them, and for us, we'll keep the spark

More tragedies will challenge our resolve
And some will shy away from tempting fate
But there's no problem here we cannot solve,
Though risks we cannot all eliminate

I sorrow for the loss of Shuttle crew;
The seven who have blazed a path to space
But for the future lost, I sorrow, too
Inertia seems to petrify our pace

It troubles me; I know what we can do
And yet we don't; the reason's partly fear
Three decades past, the future seemed in view,
But thanks to timid minds, it's now unclear

The NASA folks need mandates to explore!
The planets and the stars await our call
But they're reduced to "trucks" and little more
The Station's just a building, after all

These things should be by private enterprise;
The costs would be reduced to less than half
Let NASA look with visionary eyes,
Beyond the needs of bureaucratic staff

Let's grab an asteroid and make it ours!
The metals in it would transform our world!
Let's use the Sun, and redirect its powers
With mighty space-borne wings that we've unfurled

The Global Warming business goes away!
Sunshine in space is not a fossil fuel
And up in space, it's always "sunny day"
Which much improves the solar power tool

It costs too much to lift the mass from here
On Earth we're at the bottom of a well
But grab a passing rock, and now it's clear
The task becomes much easier to sell

The Asteroids and Moon have what we need
To build enough to power us for good
And whether we are moved by faith or greed
At least we'll move beyond the neighborhood

For one day we’ll be visited again
By rocks like those that ended ages past
And if we're only here, then it's the end
Humanity would then have breathed its last

Please join with me to tell our team "Push on!"
We'll bind our wounds, and grow despite our scars
We cannot falter, 'ere the chance is gone
Our destiny is out among the stars

===|==============/ Keith DeHavelle — February 1, 2003

81 weeks ago @ Frontpage Magazine - Sanity Is Not an Option · 1 reply · +1 points

How in the world do you have it turned around where it's somehow Obama's fault and Republcans "reported" it. What report..WTF are you referencing..anything real?


It's rather like the situation with Fannie and Freddie; the Republicans worried about the impending crisis caused by Democrat policies, and Democrats kept insisting that everything was fine and fighting any improvements.

Republicans have their share of problems -- because bureaucracies, separate from parties, are always problematic. It is the huge increase in bureaucracy that has cost me personally this year, and will cost all of us.

From the report I mentioned, published in 2009 (before the spill, of course):
DERELICTION OF FIDUCIARY DUTY AT THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT
“The Interior Department has breached its fiduciary duty to the American people. It is charged with holding our natural resources in trust, but instead, it has squandered billions and cheated the American people. Over two years have passed since Congress conducted serious oversight of the Minerals Management Service. This is a government program that brings in tens of billions of dollars in non-tax revenue. We knew over two years ago that MMS was corrupted with severe ethical lapses and that it did not exercise accountability over revenues due to the federal government. We knew then that MMS did not have the ability to track how much oil was being produced or the revenues due the American taxpayer. It is time for Congress to overhaul the Minerals Management Service.”
– Darrell Issa, Ranking Member
Perhaps you have only been listening to one side of the story.