My husband and I have been together for 30 years, married for 27. This is his 3rd and my 2nd. I would not want ugly conversations that we had with our exes, while our marriages were falling apart, to be used against us.
Distortions would be easy with these types of volatile conversations. Motivation for these disclosures could be not wanting the current Mrs. Gingrich to be first lady.
The lack of intellectual curiosity regarding the Cain women and these "revelations" is disappointing.
This just means that the powers that be don't want her as Speaker if they retake the house. She will never lose her seat. Obviously, they have been given the go ahead to damage her some.
Local, state and federal governments are taking control of private property, water on private property and/or forbidding the use of private property by the owners. Fannie and Freddie own most of the mortgages in this country. If you don't think that private property is under attack, it is because you aren't looking.
Mr. Newman is just trying to explain to us how similar tea partiers are to the hackneyed protesters currently defecating on our city streets and in our public parks. Uh-huh, right. The financiers of this protest must think we are as stupid as their "useful idiots".
He's campaigning for Roland Martin to get a prime time gig now that Client #9 is leaving.
What is really weird, Robo, is that I think we are on the same side. From your reaction to my original post, I don't think you understood what I posted.
"Crybaby" would indicate that one would not be in control of their emotions. Reread our posts and see who seems less in control of their emotions. Take care, RoBo
Wow, RoBo, miss your last anger management session? As a member of society, I have an interest in the protection of minors as well as concern for the future for all children. My style of parenting with regard to media (and most everything else) may not work for everyone as it requires much time thinking about, talking about and discussing values, morals, philosophy, and psychology with them from a young age. My children, from 18 - 26, are fully capable of making their own decisions and are capable of articulating their positions. Their political perspectives are libertarian/conservative in spite of their public school education. They would laugh at your unwarranted hostility, RoBo, and could objectively critique your remark and its' possible neurotic implications, but probably advise, "He's an idiot, Mom, and not worth the time."
I have mixed feelings about this. I have 4 wonderful kids who play games.
1-overall, anytime we have a question, erring on the side of freedom is good.
2-I don't buy into the violent games cause violence meme.
3-I do believe that government has an obligation to protect minors, but not usurp parental authority.
4-a little warning bell went off in my head, though, re: UN rights of the child. Maybe why SCOTUS statists went this way?