Are you thick or something. He was in trouble at school, got suspended over drugs and other stuff. His facebook page showed him as a gangsta wannabe. He was making gangsterish violent statements.

Oh BTW I took pot when I was young. It is evil stuff; it destabilizes the mind, causes cancer, and is the stupidest thing for young people to take. You sound as if you are on it . Permanently.

Whoever came and marked this and my other comments down just now : You're a moron.

No, not you, Ben.

Except the kuffar, obviously.

Ben,

I agree; as I tried to point out in my 2nd comment.

I agree he should not have kept beating Zimmerman when he was down. UNLESS. of course, he saw the gun. The cold fact is: the public are being fed contradictory reports so it is impossible for us to know what exactly happened. We all need to wait till the trial.

"Even if George Zimmerman had attacked Trayvon Martin first (which is extremely unlikely given the physical evidence), Trayvon was not entitled to pin him to the ground and beat him. "

Why was Trayvon not entitled to do this if HE was attacked ? Let's be fair here and "all is fair in love and war" so he would have been entitled to defend himself which includes pinning someone to the ground.

I am no way defending Trayvon as he seems to have instigated the violence and was a punk wannabe-gangsta who had some marijuana in his system at the time. But we have to play it even handed and not be hypocrites.

He's not a moron. He makes very good sense. I couldn't believe this article. The Kurds to this day are persecuting the Christians in Iraq, around Mosul. When did they believe in tolerance ? They helped the Ottoman Turks slaughter the Armenians in the early 20th century. They share our values such as "acceptance of minorities" ? Since when ? They are friendly with US soldiers 'cos they want them to keep defending them against other Iraqis. And they'll use the Israelis to gain acceptance with the West. They've been screaming out for a homeland for ages. Give them one and we'll see how tolerant they really are.

Yes. The US and Europeans supported the uprising in Tunisia, a country which was the most successful nation in suppressing Islamic terrorism. It monitored the preaching in its mosques very efficiently to stop any jihadist preaching. So what happens : a wonderful (yeah) Arab Spring replaces it with a shariah government. Egypt, too, under Mubarak was better than any Muslim Brotherhood led regime but that is where Egypt seems to be heading. And the West supports this ! Same with Syria despite the fact that some exiled cleric is inspiring an Islamic take over there too. The US/UN supported the Muslims over the Christians in Bosnia, remember. There is never any mention in the MSM of the persecution Christians are suffering although this is widespread. But as soon as the poor Palestinians suffer anything at the hands of the Israelis, look out for outrage. Also, don't offend Muslims in anyway or you get accused of racism, Islamophobia or both. But Christians are discriminated against all over the place and it's fine. Leftist political correctness is destroying western society. Only a return to Christianity will save us, and motivate us to speak out against the persecution of Christians and other abominations.

What Syria needs is not some federal Muslim government. It needs a non-Muslim government. We have seen Muslim countries progress somewhat in terms of democracy and freedom, only to relapse into Islamic rule again ( think of Turkey, Tunisia, Egypt too, possibly, unless the military gain control ). Anyway, when did the Kurds ever respect the rights of Christians ? Their record is tarnished in this matter. Assad may be nasty but at least he defended the rights of the Christians, possibly more so than any other Muslim ruler anywhere. But the Muslim Brotherhood would be a nightmare for Christians. Just look at Egypt.

Hollande will be a nightmare for Europe. He already is actually.