Let me see if I can get the liberal logic straight here.

If a man like Khalid Sheik Mohammed masterminds the mass murder of 3,000 innocent Americans on 9/11, he needs to be given a civilian show trial in NYC with a "dream team" of O.J. lawyers to defend his "rights" as if he were a US citizen.

But if a conservative dresses up like a telephone repairman and enters a US Senator's office to film a little bit of political satire a la Michael Moore, we need to bring back the guillotine because he can't be executed fast enough.

Got it, thanks.

Next thing you know, Obama will be ordering Hannah and James to undergo military tribunals for their "crimes," while any charges filed against the ACORN employees (to date, NONE) will be dismissed in civilian court.

A second Scott won tonight: Scott Rasmussen. He called this election and the liberal establishment called him biased. Who looks biased now?

Should have been #1.

Don't forget it was Joe Biden who praised Obama as being "articulate and clean" for a black person, and now he's vice president.

Methinks the Sage from Searchlight may be angling for a White House appointment. God knows he won't be reelected.

Wow. Stein's review makes Mamet sound like a total sell-out. It is hardly "ground-breaking" or "brave" to make your liberal audience think, for a moment, that all their comfortable assumptions and values may be wrong, only to then go back on it and say, "Whoops, sorry, turns out wealthy white men are evil and poor black women are sainted victims after all."

As I suspected all along, Mamet's article on why he's no longer a brain-dead liberal did NOT mean that he was suddenly a conservative, only a more "thoughtful" liberal.

To write a play about the Duke rape case—now that would be conservative, and ground-breaking, and brave, but it would also be career suicide, and on some level Mamet knows it and he's not suicidal.

The "overwhelmingly liberal tilt of university professors” was explained 20 years ago in a book called Tenured Radicals by Roger Kimball. No wonder the NYT is confused.

They must be using data from the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia.

I don't know. If someone called me a red-blooded, redneck NRA supporter, I'd take it as a compliment. What's not to like?

I can't believe this site isn't covering the death of Eric Rohmer.