IntenseDebate - senor

17 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Netanyahu... · 0 replies · +12 points

Given the fact the OIC basicly runs the UN, flying a UN flag would be the same as surrendering to the OIC.

17 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Ahmed Ras... · 0 replies · +2 points

The Demographic Jihad is only possible due to over generous social welfare for immigrants and foreign aid to countries that allows them to breed on other peoples’ bucks. End it all now and watch them starve themselves back to the level they are able to support themselves. Also ending the socialist welfare state would also end the incentive for them to continue to invade.

17 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Muslim wh... · 0 replies · +1 points

"...recount how the problems between Muslims and Americans come from our support of Israel, beginning in 1948 and continuing"

Perhaps these people never heard of Jefferson or the Barbary Pirates.

17 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Taking th... · 0 replies · +4 points

ah, but another verse clarifies what being "incline towards peace" would require of them.

009.029
YUSUFALI: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
PICKTHAL: Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.
SHAKIR: Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

17 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Canada: N... · 0 replies · +3 points

The United States mottos are either; the official "In God We Trust”, or the traditional E Pluribus Unum (Latin for Out of Many One).

Really that was so brazen Dolly Buster, your Taqqiya skills are failing you. You are a poor specimen of a Kitman compared to others we have seen.

17 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Cute kid ... · 0 replies · +5 points

If the schools, the courts, or any other government institute give even an inch of special treatment or "accommodations" every other religious group must sue for breach or the establishment clause. Because to give one religious groups special treatment is the establishment of a religion. If on the other had, they insist on establishing "Islam" as the favored religion of the state, then the Constitution has been broken, and a breach of contract between the people and government they own has been made. ALL government agencies would be null and void. An so would end the growing tyranny of the PC Multiculturalist.

Oh, SWAT is exactly what she is trying to import here.

17 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Al-Qaeda ... · 1 reply · +8 points

Did Al-Qaeda not get the memo from our New Wondrous Socialistic President that every thing has Changed and there is a new Hope, when he declared all the inmates in the Gitmo Asylum to be freed?

Oh wait, I forgot, this is JIHAD, it only will stop if we become Dhimmis, corpses, or devolve to the 7th century. (A more appealing option is a forced rewrite of the Koran and ahadith and every Fatwa that has ever been issued. And for those who think it’s offensive to expect some one else to rewrite their “Holy” Book for us. I point out how offensive it is that their “Holy” Book demands my submission or death, so Pike your whinny PC Multicultural Double Think and Newspeak.)

17 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: "Freedom ... · 0 replies · +2 points

Is Pat speaking of one of those "Socialist Christian" parties I hear about in Europe?

17 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Debate in... · 0 replies · +5 points

As for the cultural changes that the Mohammedan demand that is another subject, and frankly I see no reason to alter our societies to accommodate them. There is no improvement in what they are asking for, only a grotesque and disgusting de-evolution to a primitive oppressive feudal system that the West had rejected hundreds of years ago during the Enlightenment period.

17 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Debate in... · 0 replies · +5 points

No, this is the soft tyranny of Authoritarians using this excuse to make a power grab over what the public can even discuss. The ban by the Home Secretary has more to do with creeping Orwelling double think and double talk at the pinnacle of government then to caving to Mohammedan demands. Beware AM, these methods will be turned on the Mohammedan when their usefulness ends.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with senor_doeboy

People I'm following

senor_doeboy