336 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
Experts, at the time, could not fire that rifle at the reported rate of fire. A new updated investigation came to the same conclusion. Therefore IF it was impossible to fire that rifle at that rate, there must have been more than
The photo showing the scene of the shooting location in the book depository outlined the empty cartridges, & there appeared to be a considerable distance between the 2 farthest ones. (Admittedly, hard to judge in a photo) I feel that with one shooter & one position the cartridges should have been closer together.
The shooting of Oswald counts as a reason to suspect that he was shot to keep him from "squawking". He himself had said that he was just a patsy & that may have hinted that he had some talking to do. Therefore he had to be silenced. (Or was Jack Ruby just a patriotic American who was outraged at the killing?)
Sure that's all speculation, but the loss of Oswald really sealed the true story. Modern technology, as documented in a recent TV program, was unable to throw any light on the crime. Though it does state that he was not hit from the front, -all shots were from the rear.
Well, I'd explain it if I could, but I really don't know where to start. Sorry!
Another TV program informed us that the average graduate earns considerably less than tradesmen.
Getting a job seems to be a major problem, even one of those less well paid jobs.
There's certainly a need for some some of career advice just as you say donaldson.
I have no personal knowledge of any of the victims, but I could safely assume that there wasn't much effort made to ensure fairness. This rough justice could most accurately be compared to a "lynching". i've no doubt that this was so too for similar events in other countries, but that doesn't make it OK for Ireland.
I get the impression that those who do not understand, but would like to know, are probably a minority.
When I was an atheist, I really wanted to know the truth. (& of course, in those days, I was very certain that God did not exist)
Today, it seems obvious to me that we could only be created deliberately, & that only God could create us deliberately. But that's not obvious to everybody, is it?
However I'm finished with this thread, it has become too convoluted, & I'm having too much trouble finding certain comments. (but don't worry, there'll be other discussions, & more after those) & I'm too busy.
I would suggest that when "replies" get too numerous, say more than 30, start afresh with a new comment, starting by addressing the person you want to reply to. e.g. @whomever.
With regards to the anger & insults aimed at me, I can only say that if anybody was entitled to be angry, it's me. I'm 75, & I awaken each morning with a hope that's almost palpable. You guy's are trying to take away that hope, I'm not trying to deprive you of hope, -you have no hope! I imagine myself waking up as an atheist with the feeling that another day has passed & there are few left, & very probably, few good days left.I'm sorry for you.
Don't bother to tell me that my hope is in vain or just imaginary. Even if that were so, the hope itself is real!
On the next thread I probably won't respond to comments that lack substance. I don't like to me rude, but frankly you're just a waste of time! (however if you sincerely want a reply, I'll answer as best as I can.)
Here's to the next time ! ! !