IntenseDebate - Rahul Pathak

12 years ago @ LookStat - Official Blog - Studying Ads Can Help ... · 0 replies · +1 points

Glad you liked the post. Makes perfect sense to pay attention to how images are being used. Thanks for commenting.

Rahul

13 years ago @ LookStat - Official Blog - Lifestyle Shoot Planni... · 0 replies · +1 points

Wow. That is impressive. Very cool.

13 years ago @ LookStat - Official Blog - Lifestyle Shoot Planni... · 2 replies · +1 points

Thanks for sharing that Isaac. Does that hold true year round or is it more seasonal? (creating a hiking collection could tell you that.)

13 years ago @ LookStat - Official Blog - iStock Analysis - Port... · 0 replies · +1 points

Hi Ori,

You're right about rate mattering. However in this case, I'm looking at total downloads and total images over that timeframe. I think it's interesting that the ratios of the totals are what they are.

Naturally, correlation and causation are not the same, and there are many individual factors that would affect a particular person's outcome.

You're 100% correct that age of image is a factor and the absence of time data hides an important dimension. Unfortunately, true cohort analysis isn't possible with the data set I used.

Rahul

13 years ago @ LookStat - Official Blog - iStock Contributor Ana... · 0 replies · +1 points

Hi Holgs,

I calculated ranking based on annual DLs (Total/Years contributing) and there isn't a lot of aggregate change. Only 18 people dropped out of the Top 100 and they moved into the 100-200 ranking band.

I'll post more details on that next week.

Rahul

13 years ago @ LookStat - Official Blog - iStock Contributor Ana... · 0 replies · +1 points

Holgs: I completely agree that download velocity is key. However, I think the data still supports that idea that years of experience are not the driving factor behind exceptional performance. I think your own analysis supports that point too.

I'll post with an analysis of tenure vs. velocity. That will be interesting.

13 years ago @ LookStat - Official Blog - iStock Contributor Ana... · 0 replies · +1 points

My pleasure, Chris. Good luck and come see us when you dive back in!

13 years ago @ LookStat - Official Blog - iStock Contributor Ana... · 0 replies · +1 points

Thanks for the kind words, Lee. I was quite surprised at what dropped out when playing with the data.

13 years ago @ LookStat - Official Blog - iStock Best Match Sear... · 0 replies · +1 points

Absolutely - check out my latest post:
http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/01/20/istock-search...

13 years ago @ LookStat - Official Blog - iStock Search Analysis... · 0 replies · +2 points

Hi Ori,

You\'re right, the overall population is important, but my point is still valid. For a buyer searching using best match, they will see 4x the number of exclusive images on average. That is still significant.

Rahul

IntenseDebate Comment System

Description

Connect with Rahul Pathak

My blogs/sites

People I'm following

Rahul Pathak