Rohit

Rohit

64p

261 comments posted · 6 followers · following 10

10 weeks ago @ Retributions - Analyzing the UP Resul... · 0 replies · +2 points

The general elections work out different from state elections. Primarily, Congress has been outperforming its state level performance in the national level elections. We will discuss this in greater detail in the next post.

66 weeks ago @ Retributions - Trust the Poor! · 0 replies · +1 points

next time, try writing a coherent comment.

75 weeks ago @ Retributions - The Lost Art of Dissent · 0 replies · +1 points

Thanks. Corrected that.

80 weeks ago @ Retributions - Why Keeping A Raja is ... · 0 replies · +1 points

I will be very happy if the Indian voter proves me wrong and provides the correct incentives on corruption.

84 weeks ago @ Retributions - On the Commonwealth Ga... · 0 replies · +1 points

Reference few islands of poverty: That was an error. I guess it was corrected sometime right after you posted this. In any case that should be clear from the context it self.

For the rest. Okay let's start: You advocate development should be redefined. Kindly explain?

Btw, some may that argument for US too that it is no more than a giant market for Chinese goods..

106 weeks ago @ Retributions - The Reservation Debate... · 0 replies · +1 points

Dear Shivam,

a) I personally find caste abhorrent but if we are going to have caste-driven reservations, then caste-census is essential.

b) Please note: The caste census is only the first step. The second and the most important step is to classify who is an OBC, and then ensure the list is revised periodically and reflects geographical variations.

Btw, what difference does it make to you? Not that you have cared much about data, ever. You already just knew...

108 weeks ago @ Retributions - Twitter-Gate? · 0 replies · +1 points

Thanks for the feedback! Was posted in a hurry but no excuses.

108 weeks ago @ Retributions - Twitter-Gate? · 0 replies · +1 points

You raise a fair point. However, the only answer to that can be more discourse. If we have enough number of people then it would be harder for falsehoods to spread. I understand the filter argument has its benefits in terms of bunch of disinterested professionals parsing through news and giving us the true story but I am skeptical how it plays out in real life. Everyone has their own interests, afterall.

109 weeks ago @ Retributions - Mr. Tharoor and Maywat... · 0 replies · +1 points

Thanks, everyone who pointed the two mistakes. It has been corrected.

111 weeks ago @ Retributions - The Naked Secularist · 0 replies · +1 points

Jai,

Allow me to further expand my point. When I say partially succeeded in the political process, what I mean is failure. In my opinion, whoever presides over a state when such riots happen---whether due to sins of commission or omission----should lose elections. Unfortunately, it has not happened. Neither in case of Rajiv Gandhi or Sharad Pawar or Narendra Modi. Nevertheless, that Modi's rise as a national leader has been stymied by the riots is something which gladdens my hear. For politicians are driven by incentives. We encourage bad behavior as voters and that is what we will get.

What you allude to as conversation between Jaafri and Modi is part of the legal process. Now, whether Modi is guilty by legal standards is not to be judged by me but by the Courts. SIT is a step in the right direction.

Nevertheless, as a voter, I would not vote for him based on the political price principal. However, I would still defend his right to due process of law. As I have done in case of terrorists or anyone else for that matter.

Unfortunately, the political and legal process is often confused. Something to guard against.