morgantj
45p19 comments posted · 1 followers · following 1
13 years ago @ Atheist Revolution - Getting Death Threats · 1 reply · +5 points
13 years ago @ Secular News Daily - Young kids can't help ... · 0 replies · +2 points
13 years ago @ Secular News Daily - Montana woman attacks ... · 0 replies · +12 points
13 years ago @ Secular News Daily - Does Religious Experie... · 0 replies · +2 points
13 years ago @ Atheist Revolution - On Offending Others · 0 replies · +3 points
My recent post One potential
13 years ago @ Atheist Revolution - What is God? · 0 replies · +7 points
It’s evasiveness is legendary, it’s definition is elusive, it’s meaning is adaptable, it is intangible to all except to the one who provokes the thought. It is the impalpable, definition shifting, meme replicating, evasive “god” expression.
My recent post One Nation Underdog
14 years ago @ Atheist Revolution - Wasting Your Time · 0 replies · -1 points
14 years ago @ Atheist Revolution - Wasting Your Time · 0 replies · -1 points
14 years ago @ Atheist Revolution - Atheist Activists: Sta... · 1 reply · +1 points
14 years ago @ Atheist Revolution - Why is There Something... · 0 replies · 0 points
Only "something" can "be." There cannot "be" nothing, because "nothing" doesn't exist, it isn't something, and therefore there is't anything to nothing to "be."
We can't say "well, there is both something and nothing" because nothing "isn't" There isn't an "is" to nothing. There can only be an "is" to "something."
But that question asks for an "is" to nothing - "Why 'is' there something rather than nothing?"
They might as well ask "why are circles round but squares aren't?" It is just as silly.