Mike55
-1p152 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
13 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Sources: Immunity offe... · 1 reply · +14 points
13 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Sources: Immunity offe... · 2 replies · +1 points
Anybody that chooses to refer to me as a raciest had better find out what the word means before they throw it out. As being agents illegal’s is not raciest it is being a law bidding citizen.
13 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Sources: Immunity offe... · 0 replies · +1 points
In the 20th century US, the term has come to describe an ideology with similar views on civil liberties and personal freedom issues but now supporting a much stronger role for government in regulating and manipulating the private economy and providing public support for the economically and socially disadvantaged, though still stopping well short of full socialism. http://www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/liberalism
13 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Sources: Immunity offe... · 5 replies · +22 points
13 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Sources: Immunity offe... · 4 replies · +29 points
14 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - 1 killed, 7 hurt in Ca... · 3 replies · +3 points
14 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - 1 killed, 7 hurt in Ca... · 1 reply · +4 points
14 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - 1 killed, 7 hurt in Ca... · 0 replies · +6 points
14 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - 1 killed, 7 hurt in Ca... · 6 replies · +9 points
14 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - As private liquor stor... · 0 replies · +1 points
Congress is granted authority under Article I, section 8 of the Constitution to “pay the debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.” The meaning of this Taxing and Spending Clause provoked controversy as early as 1792. One interpretation is that it gives Congress broad power to legislate in the public interest. Such a view is inconsistent with the concept of a limited constitution, however. A second view, promoted by Alexander Hamilton, suggested that Congress's power to tax and spend for the general welfare was additional to its other powers. A third view, represented by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, argued that the phrase was simply a summary or general description of the specific powers and that it gave Congress no additional power.8
Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/general-welfare#ixzz...