Mike55

Mike55

-1p

152 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

13 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Sources: Immunity offe... · 1 reply · +14 points

First that is a lot BS. and second YES. What policies made their parents come here. None The parents came for work and never returned end of story.

13 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Sources: Immunity offe... · 2 replies · +1 points

As to my rethinking NO WAY. When the illegal aliens of start paying their far share and start assimilating into OUR culture then I will reconsider it. I do not want to hear from no nothing people saying they (illegal’s) pay their way. Not before. There was a story in the news about a CPA selling Earned Income Credits and Child Tax Credits to illegal’s to the tune of $4 Billion dollars. All using Tax ID numbers. Most of the children claimed did not live with the filer and most lived outside of the country. When you are illegal you do not have the same right as a legal resident or citizen of this country. If they want to go to school then let them pay the NON RESIDENDT price and NO SCHOLLARSHIPS.
Anybody that chooses to refer to me as a raciest had better find out what the word means before they throw it out. As being agents illegal’s is not raciest it is being a law bidding citizen.

13 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Sources: Immunity offe... · 0 replies · +1 points

From the Auburn University comes:
In the 20th century US, the term has come to describe an ideology with similar views on civil liberties and personal freedom issues but now supporting a much stronger role for government in regulating and manipulating the private economy and providing public support for the economically and socially disadvantaged, though still stopping well short of full socialism. http://www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/liberalism

13 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Sources: Immunity offe... · 5 replies · +22 points

I am sick and tired of a lot of whining by a bunch of no nothing liberals. My wife came here legally. We spent thousands of dollars to keep her here legally (green card). And we are going to spend thousands more for her citizen test. These animals are going to get it for free.

13 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Sources: Immunity offe... · 4 replies · +29 points

Try pulling this amnesty stunt in Mexico and see what happens. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Ship their but back to Mexico no matter what. That is fair.

14 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - 1 killed, 7 hurt in Ca... · 3 replies · +3 points

My point was with their ultra strict gun laws it still does not stop somebody from getting a gun and using it. That makes the law useless and the idea when you out law guns only criminals have them.

14 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - 1 killed, 7 hurt in Ca... · 1 reply · +4 points

No I know that for a fact. What fantasy land do you live in. A least I am not foolish enough to spout something with out knowing what I am talking about.

14 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - 1 killed, 7 hurt in Ca... · 0 replies · +6 points

Smuggled in. Go tot he border and try to bring a gun into Canada.

14 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - 1 killed, 7 hurt in Ca... · 6 replies · +9 points

Just have to love these Canadian gun laws at work.

14 years ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - As private liquor stor... · 0 replies · +1 points

That makes no sense at all, here is what some of the founding fathers felt:
Congress is granted authority under Article I, section 8 of the Constitution to “pay the debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States.” The meaning of this Taxing and Spending Clause provoked controversy as early as 1792. One interpretation is that it gives Congress broad power to legislate in the public interest. Such a view is inconsistent with the concept of a limited constitution, however. A second view, promoted by Alexander Hamilton, suggested that Congress's power to tax and spend for the general welfare was additional to its other powers. A third view, represented by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, argued that the phrase was simply a summary or general description of the specific powers and that it gave Congress no additional power.8

Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/general-welfare#ixzz...