"entering a federal building under false pretenses"

...sounds like Congress.

Some day, you will have to support the political party in power in order to get the best health care. So sad. Some men are willing to die for freedom, and others are willing to trade freedom for empty promises. I'm afraid the latter are increasingly taking control of this country.

Do posts occasionally get mixed up between here and Huffington?

"Science aside, one needn’t believe that homosexuality is moral in order to understand that nowhere does the Constitution give the federal government the right to regulate marriage."

If you believed that, then wouldn't you be arguing for abolishing federal sponsorship and endorsement of marriage and not arguing to redefine it? The 'if you love the constitution you should be for gay marriage' idea is completely backwards. The law treats different behaviors differently. Why do we have to pretend that two obviously different and inherently unequal behaviors are the same? Why do homosexual norms have to be imposed upon family based institutions such as adoption agencies? The gay marriage effort is an attack on the free exercise of conscious, common sense, and faith. Now those are things that are supposed to be protected by the Constitution.

I guess if we were to look at these stories from a New York Times perspective, what we have here is two capitalist pig companies that value profits more than employees, and they are gross oppressors who callously fire people while their odious owners wallow in despicable riches. This is SO SAD to see in this our country's new age of enlightenment. The federal government should step in and force them to retain those employees, or increase taxes on the owners.

But in reality we are really just seeing that the economic policies they want for the country are unsustainable, and just as they would bankrupt any company, they can bankrupt a city (Detroit), state (California), or nation (?).