kadaka
111p4,164 comments posted · 15 followers · following 0
7 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - Chavez announces new d... · 3 replies · +16 points
"Welcome, customer! Today's special is Chinese chewing gum. Because that is all we have. Please do not be frightened by the exotic Chinese flavors, the chemical aftertaste is meant to be there!"
7 weeks ago @ Big Government - Our National Debt is G... · 1 reply · +1 points
7 weeks ago @ Big Government - Our National Debt is G... · 0 replies · +4 points
Jim (emphasis added): "I failed to note in your article the current amount of US assets including land, industry, personal and corporate assets.
It exceeds $152 trillion dollars.
You bloggers need to stop harping on a national debt that represents less than 10% of our national assets."
Must be some of that "new math" in the public schools these days.
Now, when you say "US assets" and include personal and corporate, are you saying everything in the entire country owned by anyone adds up to $152 trillion? Thus more than 2/3 of everything is what the debt is up to? And that is not a problem?
7 weeks ago @ Big Government - Our National Debt is G... · 4 replies · +6 points
Can we wait to the 2010 elections? We've seen how this liberal Congress with this President, this three headed beast, is willing to screw up anything possible overnight and wreak as much havoc as possible to further their agenda. Could we even trust these liberals to do no more harm between losing the November 2010 election and bringing in the next Congress?
7 weeks ago @ Big Government - SOLD: Sen. Nelson's Bribe · 0 replies · +1 points
This also opens up legal challenges as the EPA will have to defend "the science" and justify that their proposed caps are not excessive within the scope of their goals. Good luck with that.
7 weeks ago @ Big Government - SOLD: Sen. Nelson's Bribe · 2 replies · +4 points
Those costs would be more than covered by nearly $400 billion over the next decade in new taxes and nearly $500 billion spending reductions, primarily cuts to Medicare, the federal health program for people over 65. The remainder, about $132 billion over 10 years, would go to lowering the federal deficit.
But the Congressional Budget Office found that the package could reduce budget deficits by as much as $1.3 trillion in the second decade, starting in 2019, a significant improvement in long-run savings compared with both the House bill and the measure Reid had previously crafted. In his blog, CBO director Douglas Elmendorf attributes the change to lower targets for Medicare spending after 2019.
They would save so much money in the first decade they could lower the deficit? $132 billion over 10 years? Didn't Hillary just promise about that much liberal pocket change at Nopenhagen? We are to believe they will not use $132 billion of "found money" on further spending?
And in the second decade we will reclaim over a trillion? Excuse me, but the baby boomers are retiring, Medicare is expected to take a big hit. How can there possibly be "lower targets for Medicare spending after 2019"? The Death Panels couldn't even work that fast. If you're over 65 and need to be hospitalized for anything, the "admission procedure" will include a massive dose of morphine...
7 weeks ago @ Breitbart.com - In Copenhagen, greens\... · 0 replies · +1 points
Wait, I thought the EPA was merely complying with a court ruling from back during the Bush administration, and their "authority" was clearly found in the Clean Air Act.
Is this an admission that Barry ordered the EPA action for political leverage against Congress? "You people do it, or we'll do it for you!" Chicago-style politics, now confirmed. So much for the "science" being behind it.
2 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Breaking: Air America ... · 0 replies · +5 points
Sometimes the crap just needs somewhere to spew from.
4 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Hannah's Excellent ACO... · 0 replies · +3 points
Now comes the hardest part.
What's next?
The war is not a battle. Keep fighting until it's done.
7 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - 'Avatar' Contrarian Ro... · 0 replies · +4 points
Is this a movie for furries? The human transformed into a half-animal being, exploring his true nature, reaching his true potential...
Okay, so the practically-naked natives aren't furry, they have blue skin. With stripes.
Thingamajig