yup. sounds about right from what we've seen of him. the antisemitic extreme left wing haters of Israel, like him, dominate the scene there. their hostile agenda is so clear. if you dare to present more balance on Israel, you will be banned. It doesn't help that Jimmy Wales is also an antisemitc asshole, who enjoys spreading lies about Jews. He once linked to an antisemitic article about us to try to "prove" his ridiculous theory that Hamas is somehow behind this effort. He only accepts "pro-Israel" views, so long as they are heavily in favor of antisemites and Islamic terrorists. For example, he supports the 2-State delusion. And he "proves" he's pro-Israel because he has links to Israeli politicians. He neglects to acknowledge the fact that the "pro-Israel" people he so proudly supports enjoy arming, funding, and feeding Islamic terrorists, and support the forced ethnic cleansing of Jews from their homes in Israel. That's the only "pro-Israel" (ie. anti-Israel) view that is tolerated on Wikipedia. Anything really pro-Israel is banned. They don't want balance on Wikipedia. They want an echo chamber of their own anti-Israel views. We've watched Jimbo and his antisemitic Wikipedia buddies actively engage in antisemitism and rationalize its existence. Again, any remotely pro-Jew or person supportive of Israel is just not welcome on Wikipedia. But if you're a rabid Jew hater, support the destruction of Israel or if you support Islamic terrorism, you can expect to be loved by many on Wikipedia. Those features in editors are sought after, and such editors receive wide respect and support and quickly move into admin and ArbCom positions. The funny thing is how they only cite the rules when ppl they don't like (proud Jews and Israel supporters) allegedly break them. But of course the anti-Israel and antisemitic scum that run Wikipedia can do whatever they please. Jimmy Wales and the Wikipedia project as a whole = antisemitic pro Islamic terrorism scum.

true. we're well familiar with her, and many others we haven't bothered to publicize. as we mentioned in our most recent post, much of our work now is indeed not publicized for different reasons. some people enjoy the "attention" we give them and if we call them out, they wear it as a type of "badge of honor." also, we must be careful because when we call out the Israel/Jew haters and Islamic terror supporters, and other enemies, it can have a undesired consequence of various people who might not have ever known of each other, being able to unite, based on the fact that they have been called out, by us. we've seen this phenomenon even among people who should be on our side, but who hate that we call out the fraud and hypocrisy on it, as well, and thus, become enemies of our effort. we're talking about the many who claim to be Israel supporters, but who want to give Jewish Land to Islamic terrorists, and they want to ethnically cleanse Jews from their homes in Israel, etc. Quite a few Jews think it is wise to join forces with antisemitic Christian missionaries, and we strongly disagree. In short, we have a lot of people that don't like our principled stands, across the board, and because quite of them literally watch everything we post (and in some cases, that's all they do), we just have to be careful, because we don't to unify our enemies. It's ridiculous. There are actually handfuls of fellow Jews and "Israel supporters" who have nothing better to do than to support every hypocrite and fraud that we call out, just out of spite.

true. we're well familiar with her, and many others we haven't bothered to publicize. as we mentioned in our most recent post, much of our work now is indeed not publicized for different reasons. some people enjoy the "attention" we give them and if we call them out, they wear it as a type of "badge of honor." also, we must be careful because when we call out the Israel/Jew haters and Islamic terror supporters, and other enemies, it can have a undesired consequence of various people who might not have ever known of each other, being able to unite, based on the fact that they have been called out, by us. we've seen this phenomenon even among people who should be on our side, but who hate that we call out the fraud and hypocrisy on it, as well, and thus, become enemies of our effort. we're talking about the many who claim to be Israel supporters, but who want to give Jewish Land to Islamic terrorists, and they want to ethnically cleanse Jews from their homes in Israel, etc. Quite a few Jews think it is wise to join forces with antisemitic Christian missionaries, and we strongly disagree. In short, we have a lot of people that don't like our principled stands, across the board, and because quite of them literally watch everything we post (and in some cases, that's all they do), we just have to be careful, because we don't to unify our enemies. It's ridiculous. There are actually handfuls of fellow Jews and "Israel supporters" who have nothing better to do than to support every hypocrite and fraud that we call out, just out of spite.

Lovely. So you might support/promote a neo-Nazi if they say some things you like about Islam. Many neo-Nazis also support Pat Condell, btw.

So you're claiming the majority of Jews are not sane. Nice. And yes, the majority of Jews are indeed Zionist. And if you are anti-Zionist, should we assume you support the destruction of Israel and the 6 mil+ Jews living there? Why are you against the self-determination of Jews? Are you against the self-determination of any other religious or ethnic groups? And yes, your view that "Zionists" have our "clawsin too many pies, from law to banking to entertainment and the press" ---is indeed an example of classic antisemitism. Jew haters have been saying that about Jews for centuries, long before the modern re-establishement of Israel. Hence you are supporting antisemitic conspiracy theories about Jews and simply replacing the word "Jew" with "Zionist." Have you tried expressing these views to the Jews in your neighborhood? My guess is you have not, as again, the majority of Jews are indeed Zionist and any educated Jew would tell you right off the bat you are saying exactly what Jew haters have been saying for centuries. Typically, yes, Jew haters espouse the same views you are espousing, hence I called you a Jew hater. You may claim to love your dad and the Jew in your neighborhood, but you're clearly expressing hatred to the vast majority of Jews who are indeed Zionist, and supportive of Israel. The only Jews who are not Zionist and who do not support Israel are a fringe extreme minority----some of whom have openly embraced antisemites and Islamic terrorists.

above, is the typical Jew hating Pat Condell supporter. thanks for helping to prove the point!

...and notice the "half Jewish" remark, as if that's some sort of "get out of being labeled the Jew hater I am" card. there is an interesting trend of Jew haters claiming they have some Jewish heritage, and using it to try to somehow validate their hatred. but it doesn't work. also note the familiar rhetorical substitution Jew haters use of "Zionist" in place of "Jews" as a lame attempt to try to hide their clear hatred of Jews. Generally we remove such antisemitic idiocy, but this is such a great example of the typical moronic Jew-hating Pat Condell supporter, we had to keep it up.

You are speculating. Facebook never explained why they censored it, and the info we posted is publicly available and not copyrighted. There was no copyright claim, or we'd have been informed by Facebook. It is absolutely "fair use" to take a screencap of someone's public Tweets and comment upon them. So you're wrong. Nothing about the post was against Facebook's TOS, or against the law. We have strong knowledge in this department. This is yet another example of Facebook censoring material which has every right to be published there. Hence, they are abusing their power, once again. You might want to read our many posts about such occurrences, as this is not an isolated incident. And while Facebook censors posts like this, they allow antisemitic content, jihadist content, and Holocaust denial. They have also taken down cartoons of Mohammed, in response to Islam. So they allow hateful material against Jews and claim "free speech" but censor this and art that mocks a hateful and violent ideology.

...but you really should consider registering with a throw away email---you don't even need a real email to register---you just fill out a form w/ any info to be able to see the full article...it's worth it to also read the comments,....

you just register with a throwaway email to read it, but we actually decided to republish it, in full, here: http://www.thejidf.org/2013/02/nefesh-bnefesh-ine...

"LBD" is Laura Ben-David, the head of social media for Nefesh B'Nefesh, who we complain about in our piece...

that's a good question. we don't get it, either. w/ regard to using NBN for Aliyah, you have to go with your gut. I was once interested on making Aliyah, but many factors, especially including NBN and LBD's unprofessionalism and mean spiritedness have totally turned me off to the idea. This all started with LBD speaking out against us by defending an antisemite. When we dug for the reasons why she would do that, it became much more clear after learning the antisemite she was defending is an associate of John Hagee. These are just some of the serious problems at NBN. If you search for information about them, you can find more, like this: http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/magazine/nefesh-b-...