Testifying on behalf of Mr. Morrison, and his daughter, at the preliminary hearingwill be 4 witnesses from 3 different countries: Dr. David Carpenter, Director,Institute For Health and the Environment University @ Albany, N.Y. (a presenterto President Obama’s cancer panel); Barrie Trower (trained by the British

Military in all aspects of microwave warfare; was a Government agent toprofessionally recover secret information from terrorists, master criminals,foreign agents/spies, and dissidents and taught advanced physics, science andmathematics at South Dartmore College for students and adults); Curtis Bennett,Infrared Imaging Expert, Thermografix Corporation, B.C. and Lloyd Morgan;Senior Research Fellow, Environmental Health Trust (and a Director of theCentral Brain Tumor Registry)
Lloyd Morgan may be contacted @ 510-841-4362

Well,
this is a fascinating bunch of comments. The telecom industry will spend whatever it takes to fight it and a certain amount of these comments came from paid shills that troll the internet and do fierce name calling to rally the troops before they can begin to think about the issue. for those who are not paid shills, what does it take to do a little research on the net and you will find thousands of studies linking exposure to RF with hundreds of health problems. Those who say, why fight it because it is all over are lacking any minute thread of critical thinking. It is all over but it should not come from the schools. the schools should not add more RF exposure to a child's environment. That is full body exposure 7 hours / day for 14 years. They cannot escape that. What recent science has found is that there is not necessarily a dose response mechanism for higher doses. Lower doses, as with wi fi, cause more damage to the blood brain barrier than higher doses. If you look at the graph for the increase in ambient exposure to RF in the environment and the graph of increase in autism, they run about the same. there is now about one in 66 kids with some form of autism. that is an epidemic and now they are finding a causal link as well. are most of you out there so ignorant that you accept whatever the corporate world gives you with out questioning whether or not it might be safe? remember cigarettes, asbestos, plastics, vioxx, DDT (they would spray it on children to show how safe it was) which by the way is also a Class 2 b potential carcinogen, Round-up (genetic damage), GMO foods? all brought to you by the same corporate clowns that don't give a damn about your life but are happy to sell you drugs that will cure you from their damage. This law suit is about visibility and bringing awareness of the issue out. Getting publicity (the 15 minutes as you like to call it) that will make a few if not more people question why the same frequency that causes brain cancer in your phones is being brought into the schools. This same frequency is known to cause genetic damage into perpetuity. Do you need this to be absolute or does the WHO concerns cause you to perhaps take a "precautionary" approach and intervene on behalf of our children-- the next generation. Yes, there are thousands of other insults out there that cause cancer and every thing else but radio frequency radiation is the most challenging and devastating environmental threat that we all face and the huge numbers of idiots that don't even think might either get a brain tumor or their kids will have alzheimer's when they're thirty or might get killed staring into their cell phone when they step off a curb and are hit by a car. Get some critical thinking people and stop showing your shortsighted, ignorance and lack of thinking skills. That is also a casualty of too much screen time. And keep that phone out of your pocket as 3 tests in 3 different countries has CONFIRMED DNA damage and lower sperm counts (notice how many people have trouble getting pregnant lately and how many kids are born with something or another)? Europe is way ahead of us in taking their wi fi out of schools and banning advertising of cell phones to kids. Here is the latest piece on wi fi for those that are too lazy to do the research.

Fiorenzo Marinelli, a researcher at the Institute of Molecular Genetics at the CNR of Bologna, presented the results of in vitro studies in environment and to highlight the interaction between WiFi, radar and mobile phones with cell viability. The experiments relating to the wireless network have shown that irradiation of the cellular system has resulted in the reduction in viable cells and the increase of cancer cells from one hour of exposure. The documented biological effects related to RF and microwave have reported damage to DNA, chromosomes, free radical production, alteration of neurotransmitters, premature aging, memory loss and the appearance of any allergies. The epidemiological survey conducted in the town of Potenza Apicena (originated by the presence of an epidemiology misunderstood that affect people exposed to electromagnetic waves) has shown, Marinelli shows that exposure to radar produces the root canal cell after 24-48 hours. The researcher, however, also expressed the need to perform more detailed studies in order to observe the causal link between exposure and disease detected (cancer of the breast, thyroid, autism, leukemia, etc.). According to Marinelli, in addition, the Specific Absorption Rate or SAR, namely the measurement system used to calculate the percentage of electromagnetic energy absorbed by the body under conditions of exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, is of "extreme approximation ".

Well,
this is a fascinating bunch of comments. The telecom industry will spend whatever it takes to fight it and a certain amount of these comments came from paid shills that troll the internet and do fierce name calling to rally the troops before they can begin to think about the issue. for those who are not paid shills, what does it take to do a little research on the net and you will find thousands of studies linking exposure to RF with hundreds of health problems. Those who say, why fight it because it is all over are lacking any minute thread of critical thinking. It is all over but it should not come from the schools. the schools should not add more RF exposure to a child's environment. That is full body exposure 7 hours / day for 14 years. They cannot escape that. What recent science has found is that there is not necessarily a dose response mechanism for higher doses. Lower doses, as with wi fi, cause more damage to the blood brain barrier than higher doses. If you look at the graph for the increase in ambient exposure to RF in the environment and the graph of increase in autism, they run about the same. there is now about one in 66 kids with some form of autism. that is an epidemic and now they are finding a causal link as well. are most of you out there so ignorant that you accept whatever the corporate world gives you with out questioning whether or not it might be safe? remember cigarettes, asbestos, plastics, vioxx, DDT (they would spray it on children to show how safe it was) which by the way is also a Class 2 b potential carcinogen, Round-up (genetic damage), GMO foods? all brought to you by the same corporate clowns that don't give a damn about your life but are happy to sell you drugs that will cure you from their damage. This law suit is about visibility and bringing awareness of the issue out. Getting publicity (the 15 minutes as you like to call it) that will make a few if not more people question why the same frequency that causes brain cancer in your phones is being brought into the schools. This same frequency is known to cause genetic damage into perpetuity. Do you need this to be absolute or does the WHO concerns cause you to perhaps take a "precautionary" approach and intervene on behalf of our children-- the next generation. Yes, there are thousands of other insults out there that cause cancer and every thing else but radio frequency radiation is the most challenging and devastating environmental threat that we all face and the huge numbers of idiots that don't even think might either get a brain tumor or their kids will have alzheimer's when they're thirty or might get killed staring into their cell phone when they step off a curb and are hit by a car. Get some critical thinking people and stop showing your shortsighted, ignorance and lack of thinking skills. That is also a casualty of too much screen time. And keep that phone out of your pocket as 3 tests in 3 different countries has CONFIRMED DNA damage and lower sperm counts (notice how many people have trouble getting pregnant lately and how many kids are born with something or another)? Europe is way ahead of us in taking their wi fi out of schools and banning advertising of cell phones to kids. Here is the latest piece on wi fi for those that are too lazy to do the research.

Fiorenzo Marinelli, a researcher at the Institute of Molecular Genetics at the CNR of Bologna, presented the results of in vitro studies in environment and to highlight the interaction between WiFi, radar and mobile phones with cell viability. The experiments relating to the wireless network have shown that irradiation of the cellular system has resulted in the reduction in viable cells and the increase of cancer cells from one hour of exposure. The documented biological effects related to RF and microwave have reported damage to DNA, chromosomes, free radical production, alteration of neurotransmitters, premature aging, memory loss and the appearance of any allergies. The epidemiological survey conducted in the town of Potenza Apicena (originated by the presence of an epidemiology misunderstood that affect people exposed to electromagnetic waves) has shown, Marinelli shows that exposure to radar produces the root canal cell after 24-48 hours. The researcher, however, also expressed the need to perform more detailed studies in order to observe the causal link between exposure and disease detected (cancer of the breast, thyroid, autism, leukemia, etc.). According to Marinelli, in addition, the Specific Absorption Rate or SAR, namely the measurement system used to calculate the percentage of electromagnetic energy absorbed by the body under conditions of exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, is of "extreme approximation ".

point about the t shirt is well taken. thank you.

i am not sure if you are aware that the W.H.O. just classified RF a "class 2 B possible carcinogen" after 30 of the top scientists in the field reviewed thousands of studies that confirm this. that classification includes wi fi. the W.H.O. is considered to be the "Gold Standard" that you are asking for one study belies your need to do your own research. www.wirelesswatchblog.org

yes, you are right about that.

Mahatma Gandhi

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Copy to Clipboard
-- Mahatma Gandhi

first, who are you to determine what is good news and bad news. it is pretty clear that there is not one person so far on these posts that has any information about the issue but is willing to put their ignorance and opinions on the line hiding behind a user name. if anyone is concerned about the issue then they should spend a little time on a good website like www.wiredchild.org. this also shows how far behind we are in this country and the reason is that we have a media (katu excepted) that does not report this because guess who owns them. neighborhoods will fight to keep a cell tower out of close proximity to their houses and schools but will bring them into their schools. the science confirms both damage from the amount of radiation you get from a cell tower and from wi fi and cell phones. i really suggest that people let their fingers do the walking and look at some science instead of pornography.

look at history. i am sick of the stupidity of the majority and the mean IQ represented in these comment fields.

What are the benefits of spending money that the school district doesn't have on wi fi when a more reliable wired system was in place. Then they lay off teachers because they spent money on wi fi. I am curious what you really think are the benefits?