IntenseDebate - harlon57

14 years ago @ Big Government - EXCLUSIVE: Ron Paul in... · 0 replies · +1 points

In what way could anyone disprove your fabricated assumption? Your demand that I disprove your assumption is evidence of little understanding of reason and logic.

The only person who is responsible for proving a claim, is the one making a positive claim, such as the one you made about R.P. that started this, and cannot prove.

Your ignorance is stunning, but not uncommon. You've called me names in almost every comment, now lament that I attack you in return.

A lowly existence is assured in your case because you are incapable of a modicum of intelligent, coherent thought.

14 years ago @ Big Government - EXCLUSIVE: Ron Paul in... · 2 replies · +1 points

One more interesting note regarding your inability to comprehend the written word.

You mention how my employees must feel based upon my words to you. Please note, that in my comment to you, I called you a "low-level apparatchik" based upon your poor rhetorical skills.

My employees have never evidenced your level of rhetorical inadequacy, and that being so, would not see this from your perspective. How fun that you didn't see that coming.

14 years ago @ Big Government - EXCLUSIVE: Ron Paul in... · 0 replies · +1 points

Once again, your lack of reasoning skills and reading comprehension are evident.

The point of the physics comment was to examine your claim to fame at NASA.

Unless you hold an advanced degree, your claim to working on the X-38 is laughable. You wouldn't have been integral to mission success. Nothing more than a worker-bee.

There, you've had your say, and were once again, embarrassed. Disappear. Stop digging your hole.

As I've said: I've explained it to you, but cannot understand it for you, so stop wasting my time.

14 years ago @ Big Government - EXCLUSIVE: Ron Paul in... · 5 replies · +1 points

Ah, wonderful. x-38 without a degree in physics no doubt. From the level of your rhetoric, you must have been a low-level apparatchik.

Dozens of my designs and parts are currently in space, and a few were for NASA, so your claim does not impress me, particularly, since you don't state your position on the project.

What a farce. Time for you to stop wasting my time.

14 years ago @ Big Government - EXCLUSIVE: Ron Paul in... · 7 replies · +1 points

Pretending you didn't attempt insults when they are written, is childish.

I am uninterested in your poor logic and suppositions.

You now presume to know me. You don't. �By my late twenties, I was building and running a semiconductor design and fabrication company with eventually 3.5K employees world-wide. �So much for your assumption about my background and lack of practical experience. My guess would be that you have very limited experience in any field that requires intense study, it is evidenced by your inability to think and write coherently.

My statements are not only clear and concise, they don't leave room for misinterpretation. �You, on the other hand, seem incapable of arguing a point without developing strawman scenarios to craft a world where you can be right.

Well, you are wrong.

14 years ago @ Big Government - EXCLUSIVE: Ron Paul in... · 9 replies · +3 points

Strange that in your world directly answering a question is considered to be ambiguous. However, it is not considered as such in mine.

Your suppositions are created by you for the purpose of strawmen that you can then defeat.

Your attempts are transparent and unworthy of further consideration.

You've made several attempts to insult me, but they were less than stellar efforts. I attribute this to your difficulties with reading comprehension and inability to develop and express a coherent and logical thought.

Here is how we adults insult lesser men, such as yourself:

I've explained it to you, but cannot understand it for you.

You are finished here. You may go.

14 years ago @ Big Government - EXCLUSIVE: Ron Paul in... · 0 replies · +2 points

The only response beyond acceptance of the situation would be ignoring the facts, as one person did to a similar comment I made on this topic. �The individual went on to develop a new scenario for Paul, rather than allow reality to rule.

Comprehension and logic are a rarity online.

14 years ago @ Big Government - EXCLUSIVE: Ron Paul in... · 11 replies · +3 points

I make no such supposition. I clearly stated my point, and that was nothing more than Paul didn't say he wouldn't fight the war, only objected to the question asked.

You may find it worthwhile to stop putting words in other's mouths, and refrain from making unfounded suppositions in attempts to support your position.

Either make your case on its merits, or stop digging your hole.

14 years ago @ Big Government - EXCLUSIVE: Ron Paul in... · 13 replies · +3 points

That is either a misunderstanding of his position, or a willful misstatement. Your conjecture is just that.

In either case, you are wrong.

14 years ago @ Big Government - EXCLUSIVE: Ron Paul in... · 2 replies · +7 points

Most seem to be missing the point. Paul wasn't asked if he would enter the war, as the U.S. did, after being attacked at Pearl Harbor, Dec. 7, 1941. He was asked if he would commit the U.S. to war to save the Jews.

The U.S. did not enter the war to save the Jews. Nor did the U.S. enter the war when Germany crushed Poland in September of 1939, nor to save the six countries Germany over-ran in three months: Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, and France — and proceeded to conquer Yugoslavia and Greece.

No, the U.S. didn't enter the war until we were attacked over two-years later.

So, in this case, like him or not, Paul is on the side of history.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with harlon57

People I'm following

harlon57