Monkey
89p230 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
11 years ago @ Longmont Times-Call - Trial opens in lawsuit... · 1 reply · +21 points
11 years ago @ Longmont Times-Call - Trial opens in lawsuit... · 3 replies · +35 points
11 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder home gardeners... · 1 reply · +4 points
No restrictions on the size of home gardens.
Sell directly to consumers, with a $5,000 per product limit.
That sounds great!!
"Gardens of people who want to sell to their neighbors should be treated like other home gardens."
I agree 100%. Commercial food sucks, just like commercial weed sucks. It's time to respect the home growers, regardless of what they grow. Allow the consumer to decide where they get their tomatoes, and let them get their weed from the same people, if that's what they want. They keep saying marijuana was legalized, but I just don't see it that way.
11 years ago @ Longmont Times-Call - Ingrid Moore: Suggesti... · 0 replies · +8 points
Here are a few suggestions for the councilman's wife:
1. Buy earplugs.
2. Stop pretending a significant amount of people suffer from the same "low-frequency drone" you suffer from. Saying it over and over again doesn't make it true.
3. Allow local businesses that operate within the law to do so without harassing them, the airport, or the city council. And allow them to supply their demand, using legal equipment commonly used in their profession.
4. Persuade the tiny organization you support to donate "4-bladed quiet propellers", and hire a mechanic to install them. You know, do something instead of just barking commands.
Finding "creative" solutions requires that all parties be motivated to participate. Will you strive to be a good neighbor and consider adopting such practices? If the past position is any indication, the answer will be a firm "none of the above."
If you think you could run a better skydiving facility, do it. A second skydiving operation at the airport would be great! Competition is always good, and you can use any aircraft you want, saving us all from the imaginary noise pollution.
P.S. My neighbors airconditioner is already on, every day and every night, all night. Can you start complaining about that? Maybe write up an opinion piece about how he should only operate his equipment during weekdays, get a new one, stop using it all together, etc. I realize it's nothing illegal, and only a few people are annoyed by it, but that doesn't seem to stop you from trying to control the world, and everyone in it.
11 years ago @ Longmont Times-Call - Police arrest Longmont... · 1 reply · +4 points
11 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Editorial: Creative so... · 0 replies · +7 points
11 years ago @ Longmont Times-Call - Be creative with Longm... · 2 replies · +3 points
With helicopters and jets frequently flying in/out/near Longmont, requiring Mile-Hi to use imaginary mufflers, if that was possible, would seem like discrimination.
Should other loud aircraft be suppressed if they spend a significant time near Longmont?
Or is it just one airplane in Colorado we should consider restricting?
11 years ago @ Longmont Times-Call - Longmont\'s Vance Bran... · 0 replies · +12 points
850 complaints (16.38 per week) from one person (crazy lady from out of town).
In other words, one obsessive person is annoying the airport more than airport operations annoy the community.
11 years ago @ Longmont Times-Call - Airport complaint log ... · 2 replies · +18 points
11 years ago @ Longmont Times-Call - Longmont police arrest... · 0 replies · +2 points
I disagree. Sheep do what they're told, good citizens act responsibly without threats. But we're talking about those who don't do what they're told, and how to effectively protect the good citizens from them.
No one went to prison for an ounce of weed before our new laws. And people still go to prison for more than an ounce, growing it, selling it, etc. Our regulations have not reduced prison population in any way.
I don't propose getting rid of jails, I propose more cost effective ways to keep repeat DUI offenders off the street. Giving them a free chauffeur for 4 years would be cheaper than housing, clothing, feeding, and administering medical treatment for 4 years. I understand habitual offenders need to be punished, but again, prison is an awful expensive way to discipline alcoholics. Put drunks on home arrest for 4 years, and pay all their bills, that would probably be cheaper than prison for 4 years. You could even make them work, and profit from disciplining them, instead of paying to discipline them. The prison industry is selling a product, and I'm sick of buying such an outdated, ineffectual, expensive product. Instead of increasing their monopoly on "corrections", maybe we should diversify our investments in public safety.