How has Sarah Palin behaved "hypocritically" on the issue of premarital sex? Because Bristol got pregnant, against her mother's wishes, at a premature age - how does that make Sarah Palin "hypocritical" on the issue? It doesn't - and if you weren't a moron I wouldn't have to explain this to you. She most certainly did not "invite" these attacks on her family..

Correct Vince - you are both an a--hole and a moron also, because you agree with Rob's moronic comment. Anyone who thinks making a joke about statutory rape at the expense of a 14 year old girl, is fine - is by definition both an a--hole and a moron. So since the shoes fit, it's nice that you're at least willing to wear them.

Rob, is that your definition of a joke? A 14 year old girl's statutory rape by a 30-something baseball player during the 7th inning stretch? If so, you have a sick sense of humor. And of course it's left-wing ideology - David Letterman is a liberal hack, who states on his show that he can't make any jokes at Obama's expense because he's just so great. Palin didn't "ask for it", you moron - and neither did her 14 year old daughter. You're an idiot.

Don't be too surprised if there are some cruel, uncomprehending miscreants in the audience Saturday - who boo her when she comes out. Or some scumbag who calls out something rude to her, even in the middle of her performance - just to try and trigger a trainwreck while drawing attention to themselves. If I was there and anyone did that, they wouldn't be leaving the facility with all their teeth.

Amen! See my comments,
Greggy

We still don't know how nasty and ugly those two tabloid rag sub-humans were to Susan - chances are darn good they hassled and insulted her, hurt her, hoping to get exactly the reaction they got - in order to first "create" a story, then report it, in order to sell more of their bile to the public. If I'd have been there they'd have been confronted harshly - I don't tolerate scum who pick on middle-aged women with learning disabilities.The cynics, the low, cruel, craven dirtbags attacking this woman - if they had any conscience at all, if it were even possible to shame them, they would be ashamed. Interesting how such low persons, so ugly on the inside, often rant on about how ugly they perceive her to be on the outside. These people see someone else who has struggled, who has had problems, and pain, and loneliness and loss, and overcome these things to achieve success and to inspire tens of millions across the planet - and they MUST attack it, they must destroy it, they must belittle it. They must do so out of ugliness, out of jealousy, out of cynicism, out of depravity - it's in their nature.

Certainly seems so..TV Guide said he was "openly gay", and there are some photos on the web which certainly appear to confirm that - one in which he's kissing a man, which was my first clue.

Seems unlikely - although he may have provided certain services to sailors on leave, who lacked better options. Still, that seems like a lesser service than earning a silver star as a Seal in Afghanistan.

Clay has an opinion about the music, and he is entitled to it. Lambert has a great talent, but it's art - and no one is required to like it. Lambert has a particular style of singing and performing, and he is very good at it - but some people like pop music, some people like country, some like hard rock, and some (God Forbid) like rap. Different genres of music, different styles of singing, different styles of performing, appeal to different people. I liked several of Adam's performances. Kris's preferred songs and style of performing had a wider appeal. When you wear "guyliner" and black nail polish, and are skilled at wailing (as well as a certain type of singing), and when you exude confidence and braggadocio, you will excite and appeal to a certain segment of the populace. When you are more down to earth and conventional, but still have interesting and different interpretations of songs like Kris, you may have a broader appeal. I don't care for Clay's music as much as I do Adam's or Kris's, but there's no rational denial that he is a talented singer, and has enough knowledge about music to be entitled to his opinion. Because Clay is gay, should he be required to like Adam's music or way of singing, just because Adam's gay? Because Clay is gay, is he required to keep his mouth shut and not express that opinion, because Adam's gay? The issue of sexual preference is and should be irrelevant when discussing the merits of the music. Aiken's comments didn't register as personal attacks, they were about styles of singing and interpreting songs. There's nothing wrong with that. No question that Adam's going to be a huge star. All of this wailing about Adam losing because of his sexuality, is BS. Adam didn't win because of several factors, and his sexuality was the least among them. Anyone who watched the talented Chris Daughtry get voted off a couple of years ago, well before Lambert did - knows that Idol is unkind to the edgier, more hard rocking contestants. I don't feel sorry for Lambert - he's going to be mega-rich, mega-loved, and his "losing" was better for someone like him, a renegade with a strong hint of danger, than "winning" would have been. Look at Daughtry, running circles around the three who finished ahead of him. I wish Kris tremendous success, and hope that the Idol "machine" won't hold him back. If he ever loses his grounding or his active faith, and loses that cutie he married, he will have lost everything and have been better off never winning. Best to all of them. I hear that Queen is interested in re-constituting the group, with Adam replacing Freddie - that's a good fit, and one that would still allow Adam a solo career apart from the band. Again, I dig Kris teh most, Adam 2nd, and don't care that much for Clay's music, but Clay's entitled to expressing his musical opinion without personal attacks.

I would very much like to see Carrie sue some of these craven people - I'd like to think she has a very good lawsuit against Shanna Moakler, for blabbing her private medical information to the press in a transparent dirty trick to punish Carrie for her honest answer at the pageant. Shanna "I stripped down naked for a jackoff magazine" Moakler has no business passing judgments on Carrie Prejean. Shanna has known Carrie for how long, and still can't even pronounce her last name correctly? After bashing Carrie's honest "no offense" answer initially, they now try to claim that they support her in expressing her beliefs in her answer - sorry, but that ship has sailed and there's a record of your initial condemnations of her answer. Keith Lewis is a dirtbag too, he just stood aside and let Perez Hilton berate and profane Carrie, then sent him a letter basically saying he agreed with Perez in his attacks. Info is circulating that after the results were announced, Shanna and Keith abandoned Carrie and left her to fend for herself. It looks very likely that they have pressured her to apologize for her answer. Now these photos surface, which look like they're straight out of a Disney film compared to Shanna's Playboy mag spread. Even Eugene McCarthy would blush at the type of tactics these pigs are using against her. Perez Hilton's agenda was to gain an endorsement for his cause, and if he didn't get it, to damage her as much as he could and draw attention to himself. And yet, nowhere in any of this has anyone from the Miss USA pageant stepped up to admit that a question like this is too divisive, and that no matter how it's answered, will divide the people in the state she represents. If either answer will alienate and divide the populace, then the question cannot be answered in a way that "represents everyone" to their satisfaction. That question, was the cause of everything that followed - including the whole P.C. witch hunt. What diversity and tolerance mean to liberals, is that conservatives must respect all of their views - but it's strictly a one-way street. When we express our point of view, we get savaged and torn to pieces, called every name in the book, spit on, disrespected, destroyed. The thing Trump needs to remember is that this all started with a question that shouldn't have been asked, and that the hateful ugliness that followed toward Carrie was inexcusable. She was made to feel ostracized and unwelcome by the idiots who should have had her back, and stood by her side. Once the despicable Perez Hilton had called her those cruel, hateful, and unnecessary curse words, Keith and Shanna and Donald Trump should have come down on him like a ton of bricks. Instead, they were at best indifferent to the vulnerable position she was in, and at worst, they joined in on the abuse. Disgraceful..