How old is he? How old was he when he killed his victim?
So, your answer is "yes"? You would be okay with a state legalizing slavery, but not the federal government. Interesting. And yes, it is tyranny when a government, even one representing the majority, forces people to purchase a product or service they don't want or need and which the seller does not want to provide. It's mob rule. It is unconstitutional. It is Marxist.
That tired argument that Romney keeps making about Romneycare being legal because it was forced only on the people of Massachussetts and not the entire nation is nonsensical. Tyranny is tyranny, whether it be nationwide or local. Here's a hypothetical question for you: If the Massachussetts legislature, governor and courts agreed that slavery was legal, would that be okay with you since it doesn't affect the rest of the nation?
Just stop reading about it then. Stop following politics and get a new hobby. If you care so little about the future of our society, drop out of it.
Most people would agree that Newt is the best debater in the bunch. Also, in his entire career, Romney has won exactly one election and lost two. What's with the name calling? Are you really that hostile or are you just putting us on?
Tell me again why you libs have Obama running unoppossed. Is he really the best your sort has to offer?
"Strong Fiscal Conservative"?! Don't make me laugh. Keep trying. You nearly got through that time without name calling.
You just don't understand anything. Santorum didn't make the rules. He just played by them. Nothing hypocritical about it.
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Experiment