fuzzyfractal42
68p52 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
11 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder\'s Ras Kassa\'... · 0 replies · +1 points
11 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - CU-Boulder police arre... · 1 reply · +5 points
12 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder\'s last Blockb... · 0 replies · +3 points
13 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Louisville\'s Monarch ... · 0 replies · -3 points
13 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Brewing up success: Bo... · 0 replies · +23 points
13 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boston official: Video... · 0 replies · +1 points
That was merely to illustrate a point...maybe you missed it. Let me ask you this, if such a thing existed, don't you think they would keep it behind the counter and not out with the other toothbrushes? Is it so much to treat firearms at least as safely like we treat abuse-able drugs and other controlled substances?
You can call it a "food catcher," "protective instrument" or "sport rifle" but whatever you call it, it's still capable of causing bodily harm /without any modification/. Unlike the pressure cooker example you employ in your false analogy. I think you are in denial about why guns exist and what their purpose is, but I digress. But the gun issue in this country is not with hunting rifles. I would not advocate that guns be banned from society, only that, if they are really "food catchers" and "protective instruments" as you say, then we should put limitations such that they are more likely to be used and /not abused/. Yes, this means putting some restrictions on magazine size and ensuring background checks are done so that they are less accessible to people who might abuse them. Is that so unreasonable?
13 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boston official: Video... · 2 replies · 0 points
13 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Gary Garrison: Univers... · 0 replies · +2 points
13 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Colorado bands swarm S... · 1 reply · +3 points
13 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder\'s Twisted Pin... · 0 replies · +2 points