EADavis
96p13 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Editorial: For Boulder... · 1 reply · +3 points
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Editorial: For Boulder... · 3 replies · +3 points
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder police investi... · 2 replies · +13 points
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/14/upshot/the-scie...
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - U.S. 36 tolls, traffic... · 0 replies · +14 points
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - $23K raised so far in ... · 0 replies · +19 points
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Alfred S. LeBlang: Cou... · 0 replies · +1 points
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Alfred S. LeBlang: Cou... · 2 replies · +7 points
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder council member... · 1 reply · +3 points
And FWIW, I support form-based code because the current system that produced the glomoliths on East Pearl is broken. I also support height restrictions. And I think developers are in it for themselves. They'll continue to build the cheapest buildings possible, and charge as much as they can for people to live and work there, unless told otherwise. This idea that if you just get rid of height restrictions all of a sudden developers will start building gorgeous tall buildings is a fantasy.
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder council member... · 3 replies · -5 points
Views belong to everyone, not just homeowners. And this development blocks everyone's arriving downtown on Pearl from the east. It's imposing in a Denver-like way. Frankly, I found the industrial stuff that was there before way more interesting to look at.
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder to add 203 per... · 0 replies · +8 points