EADavis

EADavis

96p

13 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Editorial: For Boulder... · 1 reply · +3 points

If you're not sure yet who to pick, do give Lisa a second look. She is responsive. If you have a problem she will give you the time of day and her sincere attention to boot.

10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Editorial: For Boulder... · 3 replies · +3 points

Lisa Morzel deserves another term because she listens. She's accessible and more than earned my vote this year by responding quickly to neighborhood concerns about flooding. While she doesn't always make the right call right off the bat she has proven herself willing to change her position based on new information.

10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder police investi... · 2 replies · +13 points

An unfortunately placed story. Suicide is contagious & needs to come off the front page.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/14/upshot/the-scie...

10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - U.S. 36 tolls, traffic... · 0 replies · +14 points

Would it be possible to add CDOT's estimated revenues to this story? CDOT says the project is on track but how do we know that without comparing what's actually happening with what they projected?

10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - $23K raised so far in ... · 0 replies · +19 points

Agreed. More grit, more harassment (the weird kind), more vermin, more crime, more friction in general . . . In my experience, that's what density brings, not just better transit and walkability. I'm open to having this conversation about the tradeoffs Boulder's going to have to make as people keep moving to the Front Range, but let's please get real about the changes increased density brings. It's not all bike paths and brewskis.

10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Alfred S. LeBlang: Cou... · 0 replies · +1 points

I won't argue that past mistakes weren't made, but that's water under the bridge. The question now is how to fix. The area, home to thousands of people, is fully developed with apartments, condos, single family homes, a large retirement community and retail.

10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Alfred S. LeBlang: Cou... · 2 replies · +7 points

The affected area has flooded four times since the 1930's. It does not take a 100 year event to overtop US36.

10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder council member... · 1 reply · +3 points

We are talking about the the view. As someone who lives and works in East Boulder it's annoying when people say these buildings located in the geographic center of town don't block anyone's view.

And FWIW, I support form-based code because the current system that produced the glomoliths on East Pearl is broken. I also support height restrictions. And I think developers are in it for themselves. They'll continue to build the cheapest buildings possible, and charge as much as they can for people to live and work there, unless told otherwise. This idea that if you just get rid of height restrictions all of a sudden developers will start building gorgeous tall buildings is a fantasy.

10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder council member... · 3 replies · -5 points

"It's not like they are blocking anyone's view . . ."

Views belong to everyone, not just homeowners. And this development blocks everyone's arriving downtown on Pearl from the east. It's imposing in a Denver-like way. Frankly, I found the industrial stuff that was there before way more interesting to look at.

10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder to add 203 per... · 0 replies · +8 points

These buildings have functioned as de facto affordable for decades due to fact that they are older. If the City hadn't bought them they'd have likely ended up in private hands and turned into something else - like upscale condos as others in the area have - in short order. The City's purchase means they have a shot at staying more or less the same (not over-fancified). The main problem is making sure that neighborhood people like Pam the librarian who have lived there for years can stay.