You're right. Try getting your news from some source other than talk radio or Fox News someday, and maybe you'll figure it out.

If you can't see the obvious, that the Republican Party is dominated by its fringe and the Democratic Party is driven by its center, I'm not going to try to explain it to you.

Look at your own site. When you're not posting pictures, you're calling out Republicans for not meeting your Limbaugh-Beck ideology.

Next time I will try to anticipate better what the news coverage will be in the future. As of the date of this posting, the Lee papers, which in large part represent the media in Montana, felt that it was newsworthy to mention that a Rehberg political supporter felt that Rehberg was a great guy.

In the future, I will certainly wait for your reasoned judgment about future news stories before criticizing the media.

Yeah. That usually exists because of the work of unions. :)

Yeah, defense of the rights of criminal suspects has certainly been a central belief of modern conservatism, hasn't it? Interesting that Krayton and the Gun Nuts are so concerned about the rights of people in cases like this.

As for "solid evidence," I'd say the guy with the bullet wound in his head probably qualifies.

That's entirely unfair. He wrote a resolution honoring the Carroll College football team and another honoring the city of Billings.

Pretty impressive resume for his service. :)

Thanks for the suggestion. I will definitely check it out.

Satire all around. :)

It's pretty clear why you post and comment under a pseudonym. I'd be embarrassed, too.

Airports? Planes? I mean, the Second Amendment certainly is without limit in the sky, too, right?

I assume you also oppose the government involving itself in decision about who can carry concealed weapon, too. How dare they infringe anyone's right to carry whenever and wherever they like?

Despite what you tell yourself, it's not principled to take an extremist, position and defend past the point of madness. It's just stupid.

Airports too, I assume?

While we're on the subject of your deep and abiding knowledge of the Bill of Rights, which other amendments are without any restriction? Is the First Amendment limitless? Libel and slander are not restricted in it, nor is obscenity.

I assume that your position on the First is the same as the Second...a free-for all.

It's exactly that kind of extremism (the real agenda of the NRA) that Americans absolutely reject.