That has to be the post of the day!

It's because they have no conscience. They only have agenda.

They have no sense of truth or justice. They don't want to be bothered with such niceties. They only have an agenda.

Morality doesn't exist to them (unless they themselves are victims). They only have agenda.

So, why isn't the establishment G.O.P. going after them?

Why aren't we looking at (for example) the copyright laws? We could lower the length of the copyright down to 10 years. And why is it that a copyright only costs $25? Since the demonic liberals proclaim their love of progressive tax codes, why don't we institute a progressive fee for copyright? When someone gets caught file sharing, make the fine only the cost of the product itself, or better yet legalize file sharing!

That's just for starters.

These "professors" are real humanitarians, aren't they? They economically RAPE 18 to 22 year old young adults under the false pretense that their worthless degree will be actually worth something when they're done. Many of them are scum of the earth. Look at how some of these professors try to wheedle out a bit more money from these kids with the college textbook scam.

These "professors" are real humanitarians, aren't they? They economically RAPE 18 to 22 year old young adults under the false pretense that their worthless degree will be actually worth something when they're done. Many of them are scum of the earth. Look at how some of these professors try to wheedle out a bit more money from these kids with the college textbook scam.

She deserves it.

I think this is a perfect example of the mindset of the demonic left. They get outraged when someone spends their own money, yet shrug when one of their own spends other people's money. Pathetic creatures.

"Once again you are changing the words to suit YOUR little realm of thought."

WHAT ON EARTH ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, YOU BLITHERING IDIOT?!?!?

"As I said, they are being denied the right to marry the person they love, whether that be a man or a woman, provided the other person agrees."

Once again, that's not true. Any homosexual man can marry any homosexual woman, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any homosexual man, provided that he agrees. How have they been denied any rights?

"But, as you are incapable of logical or coherent thought, discussing this with you is an exercise in futility."

You cannot answer a simple question, because you are an intellectual coward.

"No you have not won the debate, because you cannot answer the simple question."

Well, this is the first time I've heard the question from you, so let's not jump to conclusions.

"Why is it wrong, from a governmental stand point, for two men or two women to unite in marriage?"

Marriage has ALWAYS been defined as between a man and a woman. Sometimes, it has been defined as between a man and multiple women. Sometimes it has been defined as between a man and under aged girls. What's next? People marrying animals? Themselves? The dead?

"All other views aside, this is about the government deciding what the people are allowed to do."

All other views aside, this is about government changing the definition of a word to score some political points.

"Good Day, I hope some day you manage to find your way out of the paper bag."

And a good day to you. I hope that you manage to pull your head out of your ass (unless of course if you already married it).

"Terry Schiavo's family had that decision not the American people. What the right did was interfere in the lives of private citizens."

Nope. Members of her family wanted to keep her alive, and there was conflicting testimony as to what she would have wanted. Her husband went to court and got a death sentence handed down to her.

"Terry was brain dead as was like that for over 10 years."

Terri was brain damaged. Not brain dead. There is a difference. Besides, I haven't seen anywhere in the law that being brain damaged or brain dead warrants the death penalty.

"We do not support abortion. Most libertarians polled abhor abortion. We think its a bad choice but a choice none the less."

Nice choice. One human being is going to "choose" to exterminate another. Wow. So much for the liberties and the rights of the person being exterminated!

"We do not support changing the definition of marriage, we support government not telling everyone what marriage is."

WHAT?!?!?!

The government IS telling people what marriage is.

"Believe me, being a libertarian is as far from cool as one can get. Come to one of our get together and see the 5000 nerdy guys and two chics."

Try being a Christian Conservative. Even HELLywood gives you guys a little bit of respect!

"As M_Pritt said, its funny how conservatives cozy up to libertarians when it suits your purposes."

And as I said, it's funny how I'm not getting any straight answers from the libertarians.

"Yes the law applies universally BUT the law is still favoring one group vs another."

No, it doesn't. How on earth does the definition of marriage favor one group over another?

"Lets use another example. Lets say only white men could own property."

That's starting out with a WAY OFF BASE premise.

"Now, according to your logic, this law is fair because everyone has to obey this law and its applies to everyone equally be they white, black, male, female etc."

Not even close.

My argument is very simple. I support equal rights. Any homosexual man can marry any woman he chooses, provided that she agrees. Likewise, any homosexual woman can marry any man she chooses, provided that he agrees. Marriage is defined as between a man and a woman. That's the definition of marriage. Deal with it.

If the libertarian monsters want to change the definition of marriage, then they should try being honest and state so outright.

"Libertarians are "Libertarians", thus the name. We believe in the freedom and responsibility of the individual, to the pursuit of happiness with out the interference of the government."

That's not true. You animals supported the execution of Terri Schiavo. A mentally disabled woman who committed no crime. You animals support abortion. The death and dismemberment of millions of innocent human beings who have committed no crime. You animals support changing the definition of marriage into something that it never was. Just so that you can look cool.

"Funny how how you cozzy up to Libertarians when it is your liberties we are helping to defend, and then snap like a rabid dog when we disagree with one of your archaic beliefs."

It's even funnier how you can't answer a couple of questions.