"With the "truthers" on the job, the truth has no chance. "

Nano-thermite in the dust and metal-microspheres that need nearly temps of 5,000 degrees to form.
But you called me a "truther".
I guess you win.

The more I think about this article the more it baffles me.
When people are writing publically under their own name, like Mr. Raimondo, I would understand why, even if they might question aspects of the official 9/11 story, they might not want to say anything publically for fear of what it might do to their career or their safety. I don't think that public figures who know the truth should keep quiet, but I understand it. What I don't understand is how someone can raise questions about Israeli involvement, which is an obvious issue to any open minded person, and do so when they are a public figure, but yet still be afraid to bring up the most obvious issue of them all - which is controlled demolition. It takes a little bit of reading to understand the Israeli issue, but it takes 10 seconds of watching a video, and maybe 5 minutes to read a couple articles written by architects, to realize that the controlled demolition issue is far more questionable. What is it? It can't be about the facts. Is it that it is still slightly more acceptable to accuse the "other," even if it is precious Israel, than to accuse your own group?

"crackpots: they think some kind of "controlled demolition" took place"

Anyone who can watch WTC7 fall and not even consider controlled demolition is an imbecile:

youtube.com/watch?v=oQeQi5XXfz0&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwhatreallyhappened%2Ecom%2Fnode%3Fpage%3D1&feature=player_embedded

Even the crackpots are getting press in some pretty mainstream outlets:

worldarchitecturenews.com/index.php?fuseaction=wanappln.commentview&comment_id=158