IntenseDebate - cumandnonsense

14 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Michael Klein: Disbeli... · 1 reply · -13 points

you mean the person whose picture appear in your icon? Yes. You seem proud to draw that parallel but refute the irony? How contrived.

14 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Michael Klein: Disbeli... · 4 replies · -31 points

more puzzling still if your desperate use of False Dilemma and Continuum Fallacies...how classically thoughtless.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_fallacy

14 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Michael Klein: Disbeli... · 3 replies · -24 points

Only trumped by the irony of a person named Charlie Dickens being so vocally against the homeless.

14 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - CU regents to vote on ... · 2 replies · +2 points

The State Repugnican leaders decrease funding for state schools. Meanwhile their partisan brethren of conservative Regents along with their prop of a President seek continued increases in tuition.

See the trend here?

14 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - City supports apartmen... · 3 replies · -91 points

Cooler heads prevailed. Of course, if this makes North Boulder too "unsafe" for you NIMBYs....move to a more savory neighborhood. No? Then go sit back down and shut up until the next opportunity comes to shake your fist at the homeless.

Of course, Lisa Morzel and her dissenting vote on this issue has abolutely nothing to do with the fact that she's built herself a nice big house on NoBo. Feel free to read her little election speil about how Boulder need to be affordable...making her position here hilariously contrived. http://www.dailycamera.com/election/ci_19089617

14 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - CU Buffs planning \'tr... · 1 reply · +3 points

Yet another example of CU putting the cart before the horse.

14 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Former Robb\'s Music b... · 1 reply · 0 points

sorry, but its rather your thinking that appears overwhelmingly whimsical.

It's the Planning Board is ultimately responsible for many of these decisions and only once in a blue moon does the City Council call up one for debate. In this case, it was the extraordinary nature of the requested size. They also called up the former Pearl St Borders Bookstore redevelopment, AND GUESS WHAT...THEY VOTE FOR IT TO BE ANOTHER STORY TALLER. So you're tired paranoia against the City Council is utterly baseless. If these people didn't bother to ask some questions every once and awhile, building likes this would spring up every time. But hey, that's the opinion shared by our planners.

And guess who makes up the Planning Board? Any idea? Of course not. Look into it, Sherlock

14 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Boulder County commiss... · 1 reply · +6 points

Simply look at the air quality study from Erie done by NOAA. That which was done by leading a scientific authority. It's pretty damning stuff. http://www.dailycamera.com/erie-news/ci_20126684/...

Of course, if you don't believe in this heresy. Just run up the hill to NCAR and maybe they'll beat the stupid out of you.

14 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Former Robb\'s Music b... · 4 replies · -6 points

The idea that you can ONLY develop a building beyond the max possible height allowed, claiming that otherwise would not be "economically feasible", is utterly ridiculous.

Developers here always seem to want that extra mile, without ever giving an inch. Obviously for the owner to scare away NUMEROUS possible tenants, they were asking an astronomical figure in rents. Classic Tebo strategy. This is literally happening all across town, and in our prime retail district no less. Empty buisness spaces = no revenue for the city, so consider who really profits in hard economic times. The land grabbers. Meanwhile, the site will sit there and appreciate in value until its development can be rubber-stamped by a new batch of City Gov cronies. Then you'll see a 65 foot building.....because it not about it being "bigger", but rather "the biggest" and nothing less.

14 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Tom Lopez: The modern ... · 1 reply · -17 points

A refreshing concept, Tom. The modern Republican Party has indeed become such an exclusionary entity, I wonder just who they think remains to vote for them. Yes, white millionaires sure can afford to buy a lot of free speech....but unfortunately for them, they've alienated all the moderates. It's called "cutting off your nose, to spite your face"

Obama...FTW

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with cumandnonsense

People I'm following

cumandnonsense