I can't imagine how difficult it must be to use deadly force to enforce the law. We appreciate you, officers.
As the article says, other criminals wear what they choose to trial. Even with a confession, she is a normal citizen until a verdict comes in.
Jimmy Carter was one of the best Presidents in history. He was unable to get virtually anything done; in my book an inactive government is a good government.
Thank you, Missouri House for protecting our freedoms and the US Constitution!
Why would people gripe that they can't understand computer error messages? Would they rather have a message that says: something isn't working right? That wouldn't be too useful for people who do understand them. You can't understand the message if you don't understand the machine.
I believe I disagree with you about the definition of the word "reasonable." I also believe that there are many people, some of whom undoubtedly also understand the Constitution, who would share my interpretation. You probably know, as a student of the law, that the Supreme Court had dissenting opinions as to the Constitutionality of this issue. In fact, some states have decided that to ask a driver to answer questions about his drinking and forcing a sobriety test violates the fifth amendment as well. (Connecticut is the only one I happen to know off the top of my head, and I don't really care enough to do any research.)
Does anyone read the Constitution anymore? The fourth amendment is more applicable here than the best example I can think of. Searches within someone's body at request of law enforcement without a warrant are downright unconstitutional and disgusting.
A home is a home, and I'm sure the children adopted by these parents will have a better life than bouncing around foster homes.
What about lottery tickes?
Let's look at their whole budget: what about DVDs, or books, or clothes, or food for themselves? Where's the line?
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Brainchild