Good call. I meant Scandinavian skater. In any case, it's already updated because got called out on that via IM by another one of our writers.

The Da Vinci Code was bigger than Twilight... and the Bible.

When I offer my services of "fire-balling," it costs much less than $30 million dollars. And if they're nice, sometimes the second time is free.

Sorry, I forgot that blind people can't smile

Damn, I said Texas would take it 23-20. I'd be fine with 31 though. And it's true: God is on the Longhorns' side.

MFer.... Brandon Lloyd is a FREAKING BUST.

Sure, LeBron is better than Stephon Marbury, Al Harrington, Allan Houston, Jamal Crawford, Quentin Richardson, Steve Francis (David Lee? Nate Robinson? Cuttino Mobley? Wilson Chandler? Danilo Gallinari? Jordan Hill?) or any other stud that has been recently installed in New York. But that wasn't my point. I also wasn't saying the Knicks would be "just as bad" with LeBron.

How can you justifiably say they're a contender next season? Winning a championship(s) anywhere would make LeBron legendary. But he would just be putting SUBSTANTIALLY more on the line to (attempt to) save the less-than-mediocre Knicks instead of a decent team. If he failed in New York, he would be a laughingstock. That's my point.

At their best, the Cavs had Ilgauskas, LeBron, Mo Williams, Varejao, Joe Smith, Szczerbiak, Ben Wallace, Delonte West, Lo Wright, and Sasha Pavlocic. I hope you're kidding if you think the Knicks will automatically be better in 2010-11 with LeBron. Shit, let's go ahead and bet on whether or not you think the Knickerbockers can win 67 games or the NBA championship next year if that's the case. It's not like LeBron-sanity is going to sweep the nation when he wins the Atlantic Division for the first time. If Lebron goes 66-16 (like he did last year) in New York, it's still a failure... even if it's 34 more than the Knicks won in 2008-2009.

Winning a single championship (which won't even happen next year) in New York might make his legend slightly larger. But please remind me how many NBA greats "needed to win in New York" to be legendary in the first place. It's more of a coincidence and a luxury than a requirement -- no matter how sexy the media (specifically Mike "Black & White" Lupica) makes it sound.

Uh, since when is calling a woman attractive a sexist statement? In no way does that imply inferiority. Hell, I commented on Lackey's lack of good looks too. I guess maybe I'm double-sexist against both sexes.

When the Red Sox sign Yoshida, they'll have the BEST ROTATION IN THE LEAGUE. Hyperbole rules.

My advice to Tiger? Invest some of that $1 billion in a time machine. Or hookers that can keep their mouths shut.