Not really all of that is in fact true. Maddow is offensively sanctimonious.

Great to see you comment, Christopher.

Not sure. It should work with http://grand-chessboard.com/feed/

Move along, nothing to see here.

9/11
Dramatic, polarizing events often give rise to conspiracy theories, and the September 11 attacks were the most dramatic terrorist attacks in history. Nonsense about them abounds, especially in the popular video “Loose Change.”

See “The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories” for an overview. There was no “controlled demolition” of the World Trade Center towers. Instead, the unprecedented attack by hijacked airliners full of jet fuel destroyed support pillars, loosened fireproofing insulation, and ignited fires that destroyed the twin towers. The collapse of the north tower heavily damaged World Trade Center 7, igniting fires and causing its collapse.

A hijacked plane, not a cruise missile, hit the Pentagon, as detailed in a photo gallery. Four thousand Jews did not miss work at the World Trade Center on September 11. And al-Qaida has admitted, many times, that it carried out the attacks.

Screw Loose Change Blog likes to mock those who post on the topic of 9/11 Truth

Thanks for the comment.
I added a link at the top of the page for mobile users. Try it.

Dean,

Re: Beamer, calls on 9/11

For me, the fact that evidence is not adduced to show the 4 flights crashed at the locations they were claimed to, along with the odd demolitions at the WTC, is enough to outcry for the need for a honest investigation.

I'm fascinated by the "hijackings", hijackers, and ATC verbal traffic, and phone calls. I don't have any theories about the passengers and phone calls other than the idea that all researchers should look for ways to dig deeper into the evidence, as you are doing.

More discussion concerning Todd Beamer can be found here: http://911truth.wetpaint.com/page/9%2F11+Conspira...

Let me make it clear that I'm just giving my take. I respect your intelligence and your line of inquiry.

I think you should devote much more review / discussion toward the alleged telephone conversations. Whether there were from mobile (Cell) phones, or from airplane seatbacks (GTE?), I think most of them did involve the persons alleged, even if the call wasn't from a plane, or if perhaps the plane wasn't in a high altitude.

The maddening thing is that, with proper investigative / subpoena power, we could find out critical informaiton we are currently missing about the location, timing, and other details of the calls.

The speculation from DRG about voice morphing or otherwise fake calls has not been constructive.

As an example of what should be reviewed: Upon close examination, the call from Todd Beamer, which was passed on to connect to Lisa Jefferson , seem to involve a scripted acting job on Todd's part. A particular damning detail is that Todd specifically did not want to have his call connected to his wife.

We know that the all four flights involved lies about physical planes at crash sites and where / if they crashed. We just need to build on that without pinning on unsubstantiated claims.

I also have doubts about taking the position that a particular flight was not scheduled to fly that day or that it did not depart the alleged airport.

7:59