It should have told you where it was previously declared (as you said, probably another plugin). That's a good point though, I should make sure that the class is only conditionally included if it's not already available to avoid errors like that. Thanks!

Also, the T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM is a "known" issue. I might fix it, but for now PHP 5.3 is required for Keyring to work properly (as mentioned in the FAQ ;) )

Yep, definitely woke me up and had my adrenalin pumping. Good to know I was still making decent decisions though, and rather than freaking out too much, was running through how to handle the situation in my head.

Great story on Politico about how framing SSM using the "rights" argument doesn't help: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76171.h...

Framing it in terms of love and commitment "helps them understand".

Hi Matt, thanks for dropping by! Our "grappling" is pretty limited when compared to BJJ or other grappling styles. We generally refer to it as "ground work", since there is never any real intention of staying on the ground and grappling if at all avoidable. We do some basics around escaping some more common holds and attacks, but since it's Krav, there's no rules. We groin strike, bite, jam necks/eyes/whatever if we have to, then generally get out/up as quickly as possible.

That being said, none of the technique we learn is really intended to hold up against someone who truly knows what they're doing on the ground. The whole "no rules" thing is nice since we don't have to concern ourselves with any rules or concern over our opponent (other than during training, obviously!) ;)

Some things we've trained on (applying and defending):
- General mount/guard attacks and positions
- Headlocks/chokes from the side and behind
- Guillotine choke
- Arm and leg triangles
- Basic shrimping
- Kimura
- Arm bar

Hmmm, OK. Thanks for trying it out -- I haven't tried this *at all* on MS yet, so no idea what will happen/break. I will probably switch over my development to being on MS soon, now that I have a base. Will also start looking at multi-user scenarios and making sure tokens are only accessible to their owners etc etc. Probably going to be some pretty big changes coming as well, as I start really rolling it around and trying it out in some different scenarios.

Hi Adam -- I haven't started doing any testing yet with multiple users, but definitely the plan is to allow multiple users to store their own tokens, per service. I'd love to add additional Service definitions for LinkedIn and Github if you get to writing them, as I'm sure you're not the only person who'd like to be able to connect to them!

Nothing exciting indeed. Maybe boring even.

I'm a test commenbt.

Blueberries in yoghurt has to be the perfect breakfast/snack!

More from .com.au