Zia_Ahad

Zia_Ahad

26p

9 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

13 years ago @ News From Antiwar.com - Turkey: Future Gaza Ai... · 0 replies · -1 points

Right on! How about "The Ethnically Cleansed Zionist Colony", or "The Occupied Base of Zionists", or "The Apartheid State of Zionism". I could go on, but you get the drift....

13 years ago @ News From Antiwar.com - Will Aid Ship Attack H... · 1 reply · +12 points

One really must wonder what more Israel needs to do for the US to realize just how damaging its association with the Zionist entity is to its international image. If the US is despised in the Arab or Muslim world, it is simply because of this blind support for Israeli policy toward Palestinians. Will Americans never wake up to the reality that their very support for these fanatics who rule the Zionist entity severely damages their international standing - and indeed, their security? The Zionists have very effectively played the guilt card and managed to dupe (or coerce) successive US administration into buying in on the make-believe compatibility of interests between Israel and the US. Nothing could be further from the truth. This dangerous liaison has meant that the US has willingly become a partner-in-crime in dispossessing native Palestinians from their ancestral hearth and home . Until the process is reversed and justice is meted out to Palestinians, there can be no hope for peace in the Middle East. The US must decide if it can afford to continue to patronize the aggressor with its tax-payers' money, material, and now, blood. Stop this genocide of Palestinians.

13 years ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - US, Israel Challenged ... · 0 replies · +1 points

US interest? Surely we jest! When it comes to the Middle East, every US administration to date has responded to the tug on its leash from the world's only surviving (/thriving?) apartheid colony occupying Palestine today. If Americans don't wrest their nation back from the grips of the Joe Liebermans or the Dennis Ross', who make no secret of their allegiance to zionist dictates, they have only themselves to blame. Iran is no threat to US interest; Israel, on the other hand, has proven just how much of a liability it has managed to become for all Americans.

13 years ago @ Antiwar Newswire - Israelis: No halt to e... · 0 replies · +1 points

The impunity with which Netanyahu continues to snub the Obama administration suggests that it senses the deep divisions within the US ranks. One has to wonder just what kind of peace Israel envisions for the Middle East. The Palestinian nation lives under a brutal occupation, dispossessed of their ancestral homes and subject to ongoing collective humiliation. As matters stand, it would seem reasonable to assume that nothing short of complete annihilation of Palestinians as a people would satisfy the zionists. Must the US be an accomplice in this crime against a hapless people? Why must Palestinians pay for the WWII crimes of Germany? And since when does the US officially bankroll with its tax-payers' money rampant racism as a state policy?

13 years ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - Muslim Blowback? · 0 replies · +4 points

Obama appears to have hit the issue on the head when he drew the link between the horrors unleashed by its "eternal ally" in occupied Palestine with America's shockingly poor credentials in the Muslim world. There is much to be learnt from introspection. Americans must shed their blind submission to a Zionist diktat and learn to call a spade a spade. Trash the neo-con military adventurism, insist on the creation of a sovereign Palestine in the pre-1967 borders, withdraw military bases from the region - and Americans will have turned the corner in its relations with the Muslim world - with no needless loss of American lives in meaningless wars, no tax-payers money frittered away to prop up an illegitimate zionist colony and its brutally racist agenda, no drawing of hatred from being blindsided to foreign-inspired lobbies - and ushering in of full-blown international goodwill that comes from holding high moral ground. If the US truly means business, it needs to rally behind its President to push through its own interests - and not continue to be duped by the zionist terror, cloaked in religious garb, that has managed to take the US for a ride.

13 years ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - In the Name of Zionism · 0 replies · +2 points

Kudos to Uri for his insightful discourse. His is a powerful voice against the maniacs who have managed to transform the redemption of the oppressed Jewish people of Europe into the annihilation of the hapless natives of Palestine. For Israel to be exclusively Jewish, it must acknowledge to being the reality of being the only officially racist entity in the world today. Apartheid, anyone?

13 years ago @ Antiwar.com Original A... - Sanctioning Iran Is an... · 0 replies · +3 points

Ron Paul has it right. The warmongers want a repeat of the Iraqi debacle. The strategy is simple: cripple Iran with sanctions before sending in the troops. And, to what purpose? Here is a signatory of the NNPT aspiring to peaceful use of nuclear technology, and submitting to IAEA inspections facing a bellicose Zionist entity, with a standing nuclear arsenal and doling out imminents threats of an attack. Are Americans even listening to where their "eternal" ally in the Zionist entity leading them?

14 years ago @ Antiwar Newswire - Iran complains to UN o... · 0 replies · +1 points

"... but singles out Iran and North Korea as exceptions reportedly for flouting UN Security Council resolutions." You gotta be joking! Since when did the UN matter? Didn't the Bush-man dub it as "irrelevant". If Obama has now seen the light, shouldn't the US begin with its "staunchest ally" in the Middle East? I'm sure the Zionist entity of Israel would fall in immediately if Obama makes the request! OK, so Nutty has been thumbing his nose so far - but if the US is ever to earn any saving grace, it could do a lot worse than calling a spade a spade: Let's have everyone comply with Security Council resolutions and begin with those closest to us. Security Council Resolution 242 anyone? That would have left Israel in control of almost 80% of Palestine and forced the natives to just 20%. And, yet, the Zionist maniacs want it all today. Iran is within its rights to stand up to bullies - especially when the bully can only parrot the whims of its masters in occupied Palestine!

14 years ago @ Antiwar Newswire - Israeli FM warns Pales... · 0 replies · +1 points

Avigdor Lieberman knows well the nature of Zionism. And, peace with Palestinians can only expose the irrationality of the Zionist colony for Jews in Palestine. There is, of course, a marked difference with apartheid: The latter makes no pretense to being anything but discriminatory. How does one rationalize the seizure of Palestinitan land through eviction of its inhabitants from their ancestral homes? And, that too, on the basis of some mythical claim! The question every modern Israeli should ask is: would their colonial state forfeit their rights to their homes in Israel if they were to convert to Christianity, Islam or some other faith. After all, that pretty much sums up the fate of the people they evicted in creating their new "home". Lieberman should be commended for exposing himself for what he is - a raving maniac who would likely be locked away in some mental asylum in any civilized society. One has to thank him for allowing the world to see the Israeli leadership for what it is!