Or they could give away free "OWS Rape Tents" with the purchase of a Jeep.

That's terrific...... Hard to look at them as being intimidating when it's so easy to make fun of the stinky ass commies.

Love my ecigs. Love them so much I started a new company to sell them....LOL. vaprz. com, not sure if that will be allowed and post....LOL. As for any smell. Well.... freaking barely. I've been playing around with mixing my own eJuice flavors (the liquid nicotine that's used in these things) and the last custom mix I did was a mint chocolate menthol (love the minty-ness) with a tiny bit of tobacco flavoring. Vaped it (what you call smoking an ecig) at the office at my day job.... and an ex-smoker in the office said.... he could just barely smell a tiny bit of what he thought was a good cigar smoke.....LOL. If you're vaping something cherry flavored.... same deal. If you blow it in someone face... then they'll smell it for sure.... but it's nothing anywhere close to someone that's bathed themselves in cheap perfume before hopping on a plane. Have vaped on flights from Texas to Reno and Portland Maine. You're actually not "supposed" to do it according to Jet Blue and Continental.... but if you're subtle about it... nobody will notice. Just so you know... the ejuice consists of either a Propylene Glycol (PG)and/or Vegetable Glycerine (VG) base, nicotine, flavoring, water and sometimes some alcohol. Both PG and VG have been used in food products for eons now. The more VG in the mix the more vapor production depending on your ecig. If you're flying get something that has little to no VG in it as it will produce less vapor (smoke) and be less noticeable. Once again... smell is not strong at all. Maybe think of it like this.... your boyfriend/girlfriend, husband or wife not long out of the shower. You know that just barely soapy smell on them.... (if they use a normal soap ....LOL).... well... it's subtle smelling like that.

Holy crap.... this is a first time I've ever heard/seen Lauer actually act like a responsible journalist in an interview. I guess a few of you that say "he had no choice" maybe be right though....LOL. Kind of hard to get behind Wiener at this point.

I like the "Retro Vintage" best Laura.... but seriously, I don't think any of these are really "You". Of course I don't know you personally so what the hell do I know?.....:)

Jim.... look at the radar again...ie... back out.... looks like another storm is forming behind the one that just hit us.

Give us some links to the data ModDem. You're sounding an awful lot like Al Gore and his consensus about global warming.... ops... it's not that any more.... it's "Climate Change" now. Or have i missed something all together and it's got a new name now?

if anything the PPM are tons more accurate than any diary used before PPM. There's no question about what they were listening to or watching. If they're using the same sample groups....ie... the few people that are supposed to make up the masses of people and form a semi-accurate picture of total viewers, than I fail to see how this technology is in any way inferior to the previously used dairy method.

Like I said in a pervious post.... I'll bet they come back and show these stations ratings are even worse than previously thought. Then who will they blame? Oh.... I'm sure it will become a racist thing and it's all whitie's fault then. Which is a typical liberal tactic. Instead of building a station that actually attracts viewers. I'm sure they can talk BO into a nice bailout package though... using your money and mine. Ug

Amen Syvny11