Here come the idiots......PieceACandy and Spartacus....the Know Nothing Bloggers.
Saul Alinsky tactics. Don't know the answers, change the subject. And, lie like Obama.
We have uncovered a couple of Obama-lites in the thread.

You can't "google"....stay tune..... I'll provide you answers. Most High School graduates know the answers or know how to look them up.

PieceACandy is the obvious "fact smart" person here. But, she can't comprehend the subject matter. The questions obviously relate to the subject in the 'real' world. PieceACandy...If you can't contribute in a meaningful manner.....Butt-Out.

Here come the idiots......PieceACandy and Spartacus....the Know Nothing Bloggers.
Saul Alinsky tactics. Don't know the answers, change the subject. And, lie like Obama.
We have uncovered a couple of Obama-lites in the thread.

You can't "google"....stay tune..... I'll provide you answers. Most High School graduates know the answers or know how to look them up.

PieceACandy is the obvious "fact smart" person here. But, she can't comprehend the subject matter. The questions obviously relate to the subject in the 'real' world. PieceACandy...If you can't contribute in a meaningful manner.....Butt-Out.

Here come the idiots......PieceACandy and Spartacus....the Know Nothing Bloggers.
Saul Alinsky tactics. Don't know the answers, change the subject. And, lie like Obama.
We have uncovered a couple of Obama-lites in the thread.

You can't "google"....stay tune..... I'll provide you answers. Most High School graduates know the answers or know how to look them up.

PieceACandy is the obvious "fact smart" person here. But, she can't comprehend the subject matter. The questions obviously relate to the subject in the 'real' world. PieceACandy...If you can't contribute in a meaningful manner.....Butt-Out.

No responses. Shows how stupid Bloggers are---Know Nothings, spewing hate and lies on the internet.

Let's see how smart you are. How many gallons in a barrel? How many gallons of gasoline per gallon of oil? How much does it cost to transport a gallon of gasoline to the gas station from the refinery? How much per barrel of oil does it cost to drill? How much does it cost to refine a barrell of oil? How much capital investment does it cost to build a refinery? How much does an oil tanker cost to build and operate? How much capital investment is required for the drilling equipment?
What does "Downstream" and "Upstream" mean in the oil bidness?

You numbn&ts. Why don't you ask Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) what he thinks of Santorum? Let's get Senator Toomey's response. Sen Toomey fought back after Santorum the Traitor abandoned him in 2004 to win in 2010. Yep, thanks to Tea Party support, not the evangelical wing.

Santorum Lied. Yes, the HOLIER THAN THOU republican candidate LIED. I hope you Evangelicals are happy with your candidate. You are killing the GOP. Now, we will be stuck with the Establishmnet candidate, Romney.

Catholic Santorum attacking Protestants. I wonder how the Evangelicals feel about his view now, since they are the reason he has gotten this far in the election cycle. I said before and will say again the Evangelicals are the achilles heel of the GOP. By forcing HOLIER THAN THOU candidates upon us, with their endorsements will get Obama re-elected. The Evangelicals vote heavily in the GOP primaryes and then vote Democrat in the General Election. Wake up People!!!

CPAC should have been a triumphal moment for Rick Santorum. His sweep of election contests this week put a gale-force wind in his campaign’s sails. At this week’s “Wednesday Meeting” of center-right organizations and activists, hosted by Grover Norquist, there was palpable excitement about the results and Santorum’s prospects. CPAC attendees are a natural base for Santorum, who overall the other nominees has the more consistent, traditional conservative record. Talking to attendees, it was clear they wanted to believe in Santorum. Their hearts were with him, even if their minds were nagged by questions of his electability. Today’s speech was a tailor-made opportunity to put these fears to rest. He whiffed.
To be sure, Santorum’s CPAC speech was better than his normal stump speech, which tends to get bogged down in legislative and policy minutia. He attempted to provide an over-arching vision or narrative for his candidacy. But, his performance was rather lackluster. He received a warm reception from the crowd, but not the stirring response he was primed to receive.
His biggest missed opportunity, though, was dispelling doubts about his electability. His speech contained just a tinge too much of the kind of whining that plagues underdog campaigns. Complaining about “pundits” or the “establishment” or bemoaning one’s lack of financial resources only reinforces the belief that one’s campaign is a long-shot. Coming off three solid victories in a week, this was a mistake. Santorum has won four of the first 8 contests. Speaking to a crowd with a potential strong base of support, he should have assumed the mantle of frontrunner. Instead, he crowned himself the conservative base’s favorite remaining nominee who can’t win the nomination.

CPAC should have been a triumphal moment for Rick Santorum. His sweep of election contests this week put a gale-force wind in his campaign’s sails. At this week’s “Wednesday Meeting” of center-right organizations and activists, hosted by Grover Norquist, there was palpable excitement about the results and Santorum’s prospects. CPAC attendees are a natural base for Santorum, who overall the other nominees has the more consistent, traditional conservative record. Talking to attendees, it was clear they wanted to believe in Santorum. Their hearts were with him, even if their minds were nagged by questions of his electability. Today’s speech was a tailor-made opportunity to put these fears to rest. He whiffed.
To be sure, Santorum’s CPAC speech was better than his normal stump speech, which tends to get bogged down in legislative and policy minutia. He attempted to provide an over-arching vision or narrative for his candidacy. But, his performance was rather lackluster. He received a warm reception from the crowd, but not the stirring response he was primed to receive.
His biggest missed opportunity, though, was dispelling doubts about his electability. His speech contained just a tinge too much of the kind of whining that plagues underdog campaigns. Complaining about “pundits” or the “establishment” or bemoaning one’s lack of financial resources only reinforces the belief that one’s campaign is a long-shot. Coming off three solid victories in a week, this was a mistake. Santorum has won four of the first 8 contests. Speaking to a crowd with a potential strong base of support, he should have assumed the mantle of frontrunner. Instead, he crowned himself the conservative base’s favorite remaining nominee who can’t win the nomination.