![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
DeeF
57p38 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
10 years ago @ JetMag.com - Justin Bieber's Dreads... · 0 replies · +7 points
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Hollywood and I: Both ... · 1 reply · +1 points
There was no sexual context.
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Hollywood and I: Both ... · 1 reply · +1 points
Which thread do you suggest I post at - is there a newer one / do you mean the NAMBLA one?
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Hollywood and I: Both ... · 0 replies · +1 points
I look forward to your reply.
Curious, though as to why you feel the need to label yourself conservative, liberal etc. Surely, like everyone else you have an opinion and are keen that opinion should accurately reflect what is true because it 'is ' true'- rather than because you believe or want it to be .
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Hollywood and I: Both ... · 2 replies · +1 points
Word search?
Call it a late Xmas pressie.
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Hollywood and I: Both ... · 3 replies · +3 points
Mr Jackson was completely innocent of the crimes he was accused of - and anyone informed knows this.
As far as irrationalty goes, the insistence on Michael's guilt by his detractors in the face of:
1: No evidence being found on 16 computers after forensic examination for years by the FBI.
2: No physical evidence to support Jordan's description of Mr Jackson's genitalia was proved by physical examination - an examination, incidentally, that Mr Jackson volunteered to - to clear his name.
3: No factual substantiation of the supposed molestation by time, date or evidence of the 'victims.'
4: Evidence of gross deception and extortion being the motivation of 'the real' accusers - Evan Chandler and Janet Arviso.
Accusations mean nothing.
Proof is All.
Produce it.
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Hollywood and I: Both ... · 0 replies · +3 points
exonerate Mr Jackson.
Still unsure?
Then cast your eyes over this serious journalist's review of the files.
http://charlesthomsonjournalist.blogspot.com/2010...
It's all there in black and white.
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Hollywood and I: Both ... · 1 reply · +1 points
The word you're looking for?
Research.
Do some.
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Hollywood and I: Both ... · 3 replies · +1 points
None at all.
If you put half as much effort in doing some proper research into the truth behind the lies and cruelty meted out to Mr Jackson - you'd be making a contribution.
But maligning the name of someone who did more to help children than you could ever imagine is more your style isn't it?
Repugnant.
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Michael Jackson: NAMBL... · 0 replies · +7 points
I don't welcome the presumption by NAMBLA about Michael's sexuality. There are many who knew Michael who report he was actually asexual.
As far as irrationalty goes, the insistence on Michael's guilt by his detractors in the face of: -
1: No evidence of illicit material being found on the 16 computers taken from Mr Jackson's residence after
comphrehensive forensic examination by the FBI.
2: No physical evidence to link Jordan's description of Mr Jackson's genitalia being overwhelmingly proved by
physical examination of Mr Jackson.
3: No factual substantiation of the supposed molestations by time, date or other physical evidence by any of the so-called 'victims.'
4: Evidence of gross deception and extortion being the motivation of the profoundly non-credible real accusers
behind the accusations of 1993 and 2003 - namely, Evan Chandler and Janet Arviso.
......defies all reason.
Accusations mean nothing.
Proof is irrefutable.
Produce it.
Branch