IntenseDebate

16 years ago @ The FAA Follies - Hiatus · 0 replies · +3 points

I look forward to reading the Follies Everyday, even when there's nothing new, because t seems there's always someone who has left a new comment. I know a lot of the fodder for a lot of posts was the non-tract, and assorted other issues, but hey - this is the FAA. They're gonna screw something else up, just wait 5 minutes. I know there are Follies readers out there with somethig to say, maybe they'll actually speak up and write something to post?

16 years ago @ The FAA Follies - ~~None~~ Nine i... · 0 replies · +1 points

I believe the report he was referencing is here: Examining ATC Operational Errors Using the Huiman Factors Analysis and Classification System

16 years ago @ The FAA Follies - ~~None~~ Nine i... · 0 replies · +1 points

Eligible: The shirt was that nice, eh? You ever have the misfortune of working with Peter Grimm?

16 years ago @ The FAA Follies - Vindication · 0 replies · +1 points

I am glad to see that common sense has finally taken hold, and things can get back to normal... Let's hope that NATCA can get the Inherently Governmental tag put back on ATC to try to limit the wrangling by the 'conservative' to privatize one of the most important services the government provides...

16 years ago @ The FAA Follies - Fair process · 2 replies · +3 points

Well, if FAA Re-auth ever passes, there's language there that will fix the whole mess.. Provided that language makes it through the Senate, and then the Comittee, to be re-presented to Congress and Senate... I know our forefathers designed our government to move slowly, but this is getting rediculous.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Description

Connect with Ian

People I'm following

Ian