If there is no morality and no absolutes then there are no hypocrites you hypocrite.

Actually it says not to pray to be seen. It doesn't say don't pray in public. But your point is well taken and in the world of sports I agree with you.

For someone who is superior to Christians for their hypocrisy and sin you're words show you as a somewhat bitter person. Were you raised in church?

I know right. Atheists are like the smartest, most intelligent, and most consistent non-hateful people ever. Atheists haven't ever killed anyone, misused anything, or started a war. They are always right and never compromised by the restraints of hypocritical morality. It's good to be an atheist because we are superior than all those other people who only think they are superior.

So who was paid out of the $2.4 trillion dollars spent by our government on so called climate change? Oh, yes, just the objective scientists. The list of more than 30,000 scientists NONE of which have received any money from oil companies or the typically mentioned culprits by your ilk all disagree that Man is the primary cause of change in climate. All scientists agree that climate change is real and that people do impact it. The question is by how much. And that my ignorant friend is completely unknown.

Amen

Wow 10's of thousands - and you come up with those figures from where? A christian is killed every 5 minutes. In 2006, 171,000 were killed for their faith as recorded by Gordon Cromwell Theological Seminary. More than 179,000 Christians were martyred between the summer of 2008 and 2009. That means more than 1 million believers in Christ are slaughtered every 6 years and that number is rising.

In the Salem witch trials - Fourteen women and five men were hanged, one man was crushed to death and at least five others died while in prison and some lived then got murdered in a riot at their house.

As if using "scientific" means anything. You mean like the science of global warming? Of course religion is unscientific because it begins with absolute truth rather than questions and observation. How is it even expected that two systems of thought, one with absolutes, and one that is self-acclaimed as the epitome of constant discovery should agree? Stupid and illogical premise.

Astroturf.

Last post. Google it if you don't understand. Jesus is a hebrew. Born to a Jewish woman. He obeyed all the law of Moses for his entire life. When he ministered in the streets of Israel he told his disciples to go first to the Jews. The gospel didn't come to the gentiles per se outside of Jerusalem and Judea until some years later after his death. There were a few notable exceptions but that's not the point. It appears that you believe that being a Christian means being a non-jew. It doesn't. The term Christian was used by persecutors to mock those who follow Jesus. The term means "little christ." Christians didn't come up with the term used today to describe themselves. Early Christianity was referred to simply as "the Way" and was considered a sect of Judaism. Jesus is still hebrew by blood, and is the fulfillment of the Law of Moses, the Prophets. Of course he is much more than that as well - he is the Son of God.