Slipcatcher
125p9,321 comments posted · 3 followers · following 0
11 years ago @ http://trinidadexpress... - Players must give reas... · 2 replies · +1 points
Those statements brought me so much "thumbs downs" that that was one instance that I was happy that the Express did not select the "middle finger" for to register disagreement. The thisg is that India not only would not refer WICB to the ICC, they would eat the 65M and retract the "suspend" on the WI tour and get back in bed with WICB.
They need WICB just as much as WICB need them. When Sacchin was going out, who did they turn to? not AUS, not ENG, not any of the others but to WI, and they did it knowing how bad WI were and WI provided proof.
11 years ago @ http://trinidadexpress... - Players must give reas... · 0 replies · -1 points
11 years ago @ http://trinidadexpress... - Players must give reas... · 0 replies · -1 points
11 years ago @ http://trinidadexpress... - Players must give reas... · 10 replies · +2 points
He negotiates his own incentives and trusts his talents to deliver. That could very well explain why his performances in the 3 ODI's played so far exceeded the performances of those who looked to share the spoils, whether they had earned their fair share of it or not.
Samuels, if what you say is true, may have negotiated for himself a contract full of incentives, which was why he set out on a run spree in the first 3 ODI's of 16, 126* and 112 for an average of 127. No other person even came close to that level performance.
11 years ago @ http://trinidadexpress... - DAMAGE CONTROL | Trini... · 0 replies · +1 points
11 years ago @ http://trinidadexpress... - DAMAGE CONTROL | Trini... · 0 replies · +1 points
11 years ago @ http://trinidadexpress... - DAMAGE CONTROL | Trini... · 0 replies · -4 points
11 years ago @ http://trinidadexpress... - DAMAGE CONTROL | Trini... · 1 reply · -1 points
11 years ago @ http://trinidadexpress... - DAMAGE CONTROL | Trini... · 1 reply · -3 points
11 years ago @ http://trinidadexpress... - DAMAGE CONTROL | Trini... · 2 replies · -2 points
Even in your example of the principal and his agent. The principal offered the house to the agent to sell it. The agent accepted the offer with the promise to sell it. That promise constitutes consideration. They have a contract.
Also, between merchants - An offer to buy or sell goods in a signed writing, is not revocable for lack of consideration for the time stated. If no time is stated, it shall be for a reasonable time" What is a reasonable time depends on the industry. For instance it would be different for the , say, fish industry and the lumbar industry