IntenseDebate - Scott

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Attorney: Woods\' wife... · 0 replies · 0 points

COME ON MAN,

Why would anyone care about this story??? Isnt Tiger allowed a personal life? Shouldnt this be between Tiger and his wife? Why does the world have to get involved in this?

Is he an elected offical held up to higher moral standards? NO, he's just a guy who plays golf for a living, why the big intrest in this? Who does this effect, other than him and his wife?

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - UK climate scientist t... · 15 replies · +21 points

Any doubt that Mr. Jones overstated the case for man-made climate change at the direction of Al Gore and the UN?

Wouldnt it be great if Al Gore's facts were checked?????

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Report: Russia to allo... · 0 replies · +6 points

these do nothing shields sure did worry the Russians for some strange unknown reason?

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Report: Russia to allo... · 1 reply · +12 points

Seemed to have worked real well under Reagan. What about the idea of haveing some type of defence in countries like Poland to knock down a few of those "pre-emtive" nukes?

I dont know something about peace through strength?

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Groups decry police re... · 1 reply · +2 points

Is it easier to single out one or two trouble makers from a peaceful protest than it is to single out one or two peaceful protesters from an anarchist’s riot?

I know this is not what dcunning30 said, but shouldn’t common since should prevail?

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Groups decry police re... · 0 replies · +1 points

I fully agree with the right to protest. In fact I have spent 24 years defending the rights of every American to free speech, lawful assembly, and to peacefully protest. However, there is a line between peaceful protest and protection of the public safety.

Historically the protests at the GXX Summits have been anarchist protests, which are very violent. Public and private property has been damaged; personal safety has been at risk.

When it comes to this type of protest (anarchist) the police have a duty to protect and serve the public interest. What would be the reaction if the police did not error on the side of safety? What would the reaction have been if the police were not able to control the crowd and the $50,000 damage tuned out to be a drop in the bucket?

Peaceful protest is one thing; a riot is a completely different matter.

Was there a need for arrest at the TEA Party in D.C? The TEA Party was also a protest against the Government; however, there was no property damage, nor arrest. It’s the form of protest that is a danger to public safety.

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Groups decry police re... · 0 replies · +1 points

I fully agree with the right to protest. In fact I have spent 24 years defending the rights of every American to free speech, lawful assembly, and to peacefully protest. However, there is a line between peaceful protest and protection of the public safety.

Historically the protests at the GXX Summits have been anarchist protests, which are very violent. Public and private property has been damaged; personal safety has been at risk.

When it comes to this type of protest (anarchist) the police have a duty to protect and serve the public interest. What would be the reaction if the police did not error on the side of safety? What would the reaction have been if the police were not able to control the crowd and the $50,000 damage tuned out to be a drop in the bucket?

Peaceful protest is one thing; a riot is a completely different matter.

Was there a need for arrest at the TEA Party in D.C? The TEA Party was also a protest against the Government; however, there was no property damage, nor arrest. It’s the form of protest that is a danger to public safety.

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Groups decry police re... · 0 replies · +2 points

The vast majority of protestors at the G20 meeting have historically been Anarchist, which by definition advocates NO RULES, NO LIMITS, so…..now these Anarchist are upset that the police (in their mind) didn’t follow the rules?????

If you are there at the protest, you get the same treatment as everyone else there. Seems to me that if put yourself in that situation, how can you expect not to suffer the consequences?

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - How many people have y... · 0 replies · +4 points

Well, this explaines alot

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - www.breitbart.com/arti... · 0 replies · +1 points

The VP CAN, work with the Senate to shape policy. The VP IS in charge of the Senate which means taking charge of the direction. Just because other VP choose to only show up to break ties, or sit behind the President when he addresses Congress does not mean she is incorrect in her answer.

She is talking to an 8 year old, how detailed does she need to be? But in my opinion the answer should be more than just breaking ties. Even a 3rd grader knows that’s not much of a job.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with Scott_R

People I'm following

Scott_R