Scott Edward Walker
13p6 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
13 years ago @ Gabriel Weinberg'... - False Dichotomies in C... · 1 reply · +1 points
13 years ago @ Burnham's Beat - Why Convertible Debt I... · 1 reply · +1 points
13 years ago @ Burnham's Beat - Why Convertible Debt I... · 3 replies · +1 points
I also wanted to clarify your comment that as, "Jason Mendleson points out, a convertible debt financing technically makes a start-up insolvent from Day 1." This is incorrect under Delaware law (where most companies are incorporated).
Indeed, as I explained in my comment to Jason's post, under North American Catholic Educ. Programming Found, Inc. v. Gheewalla, the leading Delaware case, “insolvency” is defined as (i) “an inability to meet maturing obligations as they fall due in the ordinary course of business” (the so-called “Equity Test”) or (ii) “a deficiency of assets below liabilities with no reasonable prospect that the business can be successfully continued in the face thereof” (the so-called “Balance Sheet Test”).
Based on the facts of each case, the Delaware Chancery Court has applied either or both of these tests. Under the Balance Sheet test, however, a company’s assets must be “fairly valued.” Moreover, several Delaware courts have noted that defining insolvency merely as a corporation’s liabilities exceeding its assets (as you have done) fails to take into account emerging corporations that take advantage of business opportunities.
Accordingly, if a startup issues convertible notes it is NOT "insolvent" just because its liabilities exceed its assets on its balance sheet.
Cheers,
Scott
13 years ago @ Mendelson's Musings - The Convertible Debt D... · 1 reply · +2 points
1) Your definition of “insolvency” is not generally applied by the Courts. Indeed, under North American Catholic Educ. Programming Found, Inc. v. Gheewalla, the leading Delaware case, “insolvency” is defined as (i) “an inability to meet maturing obligations as they fall due in the ordinary course of business” (the so-called “Equity Test”) or (ii) “a deficiency of assets below liabilities with no reasonable prospect that the business can be successfully continued in the face thereof” (the so-called “Balance Sheet Test”).
Based on the facts of each case, the Delaware Chancery Court has applied either or both of these tests. Under the Balance Sheet test, however, a company’s assets must be “fairly valued.” Moreover, several Delaware courts have noted that defining insolvency merely as a corporation’s liabilities exceeding its assets fails to take into account emerging corporations that take advantage of business opportunities.
2) In Gheewalla, the Court held that the fiduciary duties of directors in an insolvent corporation continue to be owed to the corporation.
3) The Court also held in Gheewalla that the creditors have no right, as a matter of law, to bring a direct claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the corporation’s directors.
14 years ago @ Mendelson's Musings - Why There Will Never b... · 0 replies · +1 points
Thanks,
Scott
@ScottEdWalker
14 years ago @ Mendelson's Musings - Why There Will Never b... · 1 reply · +1 points