IntenseDebate - PyroTech03

12 years ago @ EvE Local Spam - Episode 6: Of Bloggers... · 0 replies · +1 points

huh?

12 years ago @ EvE Local Spam - Episode 5: "Nothing to... · 0 replies · +1 points

Glad to be back!

Just go back a couple of episodes before we podfadded....it'll all make sense xD

Gonna be recording in a few hours as well \o/

12 years ago @ EvE Local Spam - Episode 5: "Nothing to... · 0 replies · +1 points

I thought it was #PlexForPoetic tho? :L

13 years ago @ EvE Local Spam - Episode 4: DAS REEBOOT... · 0 replies · +2 points

Don't worry, We have alot of lawn to shit up first :3

13 years ago @ EvE Local Spam - EVE Local Spam...DAS R... · 0 replies · +1 points

About done with editing....hope to have it up tomorrow!

13 years ago @ Wandering the Void - Fixing New Eden: Sover... · 0 replies · +1 points

FYI, I typed this while at work....I may revise this comment when I get home if it doesn't make sense for some reason >.>

And sorry for it being nested....couldn't figure out how it would actually show -_-

13 years ago @ Wandering the Void - Fixing New Eden: Sover... · 1 reply · +1 points

If the owning alliance isn't there, then the bleed would happen whether the other group came in or if no one entered the system for a year.

But to anser your question directly, if fleeted, it only counts towards one entity. If not fleeted, then it's all being split up to where even the owners won't want their friends around for too long. If suddenly you had the option to "contest" it would be pretty tempting if they didn't expect it.
And as I said, your not going to change the human nature of coallition's and the many vs few equation. However, with the fact that the many would have to stick around afterward to keep...it still starts making it impractical for them to go about and constantly maintain such a thing. Thus making space that smaller entities could move into and fight amongst themselves over it. But the fact of the matter is, friends are always going to be the trump card. I don't think you'll ever get rid of that. This just helps make it a bit more impractical for large bloc's to hold swaths of space unending. Thanks for the reply!

13 years ago @ Wandering the Void - Fixing New Eden: Sover... · 2 replies · +1 points

Otherwise, if not in the same fleet, all the groups would be contributing to different alliances and could actually be detrimental to the take over of the system by the intended entity.

The sway that your mentioning would only be temporary in most cases. As this would only be short termed activity unless your coallition buddies moved into the system as well. At which time, they would be counting towards their own and removing from the owners. AND not neccessarily helping the people trying to take over the system (would again, have to remain in fleet the entire time). Assuming they don't activly try to contest, this won't be an issue with systems that have an IHUB installed as long as the owning corp/alliance maintains some amount of presence there.

13 years ago @ Wandering the Void - Fixing New Eden: Sover... · 3 replies · +1 points

Averageing would be needed for the sake of activity and what not. Maybe even a "cap" on the max that it can go up or down at any one time?

As for the fights, I'll throw this out there first. It's been awhile since I been involved in any sort of engagment like this. But the way I was used to doing it, you would still form fleets up, and these fleets would count to whomever was Boss of the fleet (under my system suggestion above). Therefore a united front would be able to apply this to great effect.

14 years ago @ EvE Local Spam - Local Spam Ep 3: b-b-b... · 0 replies · +1 points

Thanks for the comment!

IntenseDebate Comment System

Description

Connect with PyroTech03

My blogs/sites

People I'm following

PyroTech03