I'm not thrilled with the religious nature of the Capitol Hill event. I think it's going to backfire and give bigots like the SIOA ammunition for their propaganda, and I've said as much to a Muslim friend. However, I'm willing to bet that at least half of the attendees will be young women, as Muslim congregations usually are, so I have no idea where the heck they got the notion that a female presence is a "disruption".

I've visited a few Middle Eastern countries (Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt) and from what I've seen there is no religious enforcement there, at least not by the government. Just like the US and pretty much every country in the world, in every one the capitols and major cities were generally secular (Amman, Beirut, Cairo) - Alexandria's beaches had as many bikini-clad women as the California coast line. But when you go deeper into any country and hit the small towns and villages you'll find the Muslim Bible Belt. To my knowledge, the vast majority of the middle east - with a few obvious exceptions - resembles these countries.

So if most Arab and Muslim countries haven't been "Islamized" nor implemented Sharia law, how are the US and Europe in danger? Does Islamization mean the mere presence of Muslims? Am I missing something?

The above graphic illustrates exactly how little control Palestinians have over their own lives, and the settlement's success in making a Palestinian state impossible. Look at how fragmented the Palestinian "territories" are. Perpetually shrinking bits and pieces - crumbs, really - and each one surrounded by hostile settlers and occupation forces.

Good. It's always helpful when Israelis are quick to use Nazi tactics and make a point to flaunt their contempt for international law and human rights. Makes our job exposing them that much easier.

Barbarossa: If living on a piece of land for hundreds of years doesn't entitle you to it, I don't know what does. During the reign of the Ottoman empire the Arab nations did not consider themselves separate entities like today, the arrangement was much like the United States (it would be as silly as saying Texans were a separate people from Californians).

Also, can you please explain why a Jewish settler from Europe or America is more entitled to Palestinian land than the families who've been there for generations? Your hypocrisy is overwhelming.

Israel has refused both the one AND two-state solutions. So which side is it exactly that doesn't have a partner in peace?

Your comment is loaded with inaccuracies, but I will say this: If a country has the right to defend itself by preemptively "incapacitating" a hostile power which has repeatedly threatened to attack, does this give Iran the right to attack the United States for threatening to "obliterate" and "bomb bomb bomb" Iran?

Until I see a convincing video of a living, breathing, moving Osama, I'll stick with the conclusion that he's been dead for a while. At the very least he's still on the CIA payroll, because for the life of me I can't understand how men living in caves in a 3rd world country occupied by the US for 8 years can slip through our fingers while traveling by donkey, and manage to produce videos and issue statements while they're at it.

His recordings always surface at the most advantageous time for the White House, and usually ring of truth. This could serve two purposes: 1) It might still appeal to any Muslims who are either pissed off or stupid enough to look to him as a leader, and 2) Osama's message echos and applauds the antiwar and 9/11 truth movements, thereby making it uncomfortable enough for Americans to not want to be associated with something OBL endorses.

You don't really want to agree with Osama bin Laden on anything, do you? I didn't think so.

This article assumes that the election was fraudulent, yet even the mainstream media admits there is no evidence to back up such an accusation.