Philip123
18p9 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
14 years ago @ BioEdge - Marketing and science ... · 0 replies · +1 points
14 years ago @ Connecticut News, Weat... - Group to buy cervical ... · 0 replies · +1 points
14 years ago @ WANE TV News Channel 1... - Group to buy cervical ... · 0 replies · +1 points
14 years ago @ Connecticut News, Weat... - Vaccinations urged as ... · 0 replies · +1 points
http:healthjournalclub.com?p=987
saying pregnant women should NEVER get the flu shot
16 years ago @ Daily Camera: Letters ... - Roya Brown: Victims of... · 0 replies · +1 points
http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/2010/01/100...
16 years ago @ CSMonitor: Innovation - MagicJack meets cell t... · 0 replies · +1 points
Paul
http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/
16 years ago @ Macleans.ca - Why climate change is ... · 1 reply · +3 points
Never got that far of course, but even saying one knows global temperature with any degree of accuracy needs to be demonstrated. From there can one determine with any confidence, given changes in methodology, past trends in temperature? From there can one make predictive models of temperature change (and have they been confirmed!!) especially on the scale of decades and centuries, as this seems to be the idea underlying much of “the sky is falling, the sky is falling … give us your money” political discourse of late. If one ever confirmed that future temperature trends were accurately being predicted, would one have any confidence that they understood the underlying causes and from there the necessary changes (ie the “give us your money” part). Funny that the solution proffered to a postulated future trend in global temperature is an attempt at man-made global cooling.
Finally, one should recognize when surrogates are being used in place of actual temperature readings, i.e. tree ring data might reflect not just temperature but for instance CO2 concentration, coral reefs, local predator populations, ice cover, ocean salinity and ice particulate content etc, etc.
I would think given the complexity of the climate the last thing anyone would want is some global treaty to attempt anthropogenic climate change.
http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/
16 years ago @ CSMonitor: Environment - James Hoggan talks abo... · 1 reply · +1 points
Never got that far of course, but even saying one knows global temperature with any degree of accuracy needs to be demonstrated. From there can one determine with any confidence, given changes in methodology, past trends in temperature? From there can one make predictive models of temperature change (and have they been confirmed!!) especially on the scale of decades and centuries, as this seems to be the idea underlying much of “the sky is falling, the sky is falling … give us your money” political discourse of late. If one ever confirmed that future temperature trends were accurately being predicted, would one have any confidence that they understood the underlying causes and from there the necessary changes (ie the “give us your money” part). Funny that the solution proffered to a postulated future trend in global temperature is an attempt at man-made global cooling.
Finally, one should recognize when surrogates are being used in place of actual temperature readings, i.e. tree ring data might reflect not just temperature but for instance CO2 concentration, coral reefs, local predator populations, ice cover, ocean salinity and ice particulate content etc, etc.
I would think given the complexity of the climate the last thing anyone would want is some global treaty to attempt anthropogenic climate change.
http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/
16 years ago @ Big Hollywood - 25 Greatest Christmas ... · 0 replies · +1 points
http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/