NL_Expatriate

NL_Expatriate

23p

19 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

13 years ago @ Macleans.ca - Money goes in, money g... · 0 replies · +4 points

Only the candidates should be allowed tax exemption stats!

14 years ago @ Macleans.ca - Parliament will fight · 0 replies · +1 points

Why Harper can't walk and Chew gum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eabExF3M5kM

14 years ago @ Macleans.ca - Does Stephen Harpe... · 0 replies · +2 points

Didn't realize I could embed on here.
Part 2/2 Richard Colvin's senate committee testimony on Afstan detainee complicity.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eabExF3M5kM

14 years ago @ Macleans.ca - Does Stephen Harpe... · 0 replies · +2 points

Part 1/2 Richard Colvin senate testimony Afstan Detainee complicity.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLycAWlnkgU

14 years ago @ Macleans.ca - Canadian democracy is ... · 0 replies · +1 points

The canadian democracy as it currently stands is nothing more than a Tyranny of the Majority for the minority provinces and a Tyranny of the English majority for the french speaking Quebecois.

We need an Equal Senate to promote a vision for the nation as opposed to what all of the national parties are promoting now which is a vision for the majority of the population, or Tyranny of the majority pop.

Equal to promote a vision for the majority of the Provinces in the federation or a vision for the nation if you will.

Unelected so as not to challenge the supremacy of the elected Rep by pop HOC, and Ontario's majority.

Appointed by the prov to rep the prov and appease the Premiers and remain non-partisan and out of the purview of the Tyranny of the majority pop national parties.

Bilingual (functionally, Culturally) to appease the Quebecois (French speaking minority) in what is otherwise as far as Quebecois are concerned a Tyranny of the Majority English Speaking population.

Problem is any national party that advocates equality in the senate for PEI with Ontario will never get a majority and as such it is a catch 22. Consider it has already been tried with Meechlake and Charlo9ttetown accords and failed miserably.

So I guess we are doomed to balkanize the HOC instead of the Senate.

14 years ago @ Macleans.ca - If Canada’s democrac... · 0 replies · +1 points

I would rather go to jail than vote for a national Tyranny of the majority pop party due to our systemically flawed per capita Colonialist democracy.

14 years ago @ Macleans.ca - Our democracy: Now bro... · 0 replies · +1 points

The canadian democracy as it currently stands is nothing more than a Tyranny of the Majority for the minority provinces and a Tyranny of the English majority for the french speaking Quebecois.

We need an Equal Senate to promote a vision for the nation as opposed to what all of the national parties are promoting now which is a vision for the majority of the population, or Tyranny of the majority pop.

Equal to promote a vision for the majority of the Provinces in the federation or a vision for the nation if you will.

Unelected so as not to challenge the supremacy of the elected Rep by pop HOC, and Ontario's majority.

Appointed by the prov to rep the prov and appease the Premiers and remain non-partisan and out of the purview of the Tyranny of the majority pop national parties.

Bilingual (functionally, Culturally) to appease the Quebecois (French speaking minority) in what is otherwise as far as Quebecois are concerned a Tyranny of the Majority English Speaking population.

Problem is any national party that advocates equality in the senate for PEI with Ontario will never get a majority and as such it is a catch 22. Consider it has already been tried with Meechlake and Charlo9ttetown accords and failed miserably.

So I guess we are doomed to balkanize the HOC instead of the Senate.

14 years ago @ Macleans.ca - The life of the party · 1 reply · 0 points

Just another CAT in our systemically flawed Tyranny of the majority (Mouseland) democracy Where the only representation is by population and a vision for the majority of the members of the federation Provinces is sadly lacking in all of the PROXY parties of the Upper Lower canada majority.

15 years ago @ Angry in the Great Whi... - Mike Duffy and the Sen... · 2 replies · +1 points

And lo, Newfoundlanders and Labradorians led all the rest

Cross Examination by Averill Baker
The Charter
The last line in the poem Abou Ben Adam reads, “And Lo Ben Adam’s name led all the rest.” Amen.
Figures were released three weeks ago identifying the provinces that contribute the most to the Canadian economy in exports to foreign countries and lo Newfoundlanders and Labradorians led all the rest – again. But, this time, it’s in spades, as the gamblers say, with the one-eyed-jack-of-diamonds-and-the-devil-close-behind way.
Newfoundlanders and Labradorians now contribute more to the Canadian economy per capita than any other Canadians to such a remarkable degree that it makes one feel sympathy toward Canadians from other provinces.
Other Canadians who look at these recent figures must feel embarrassed that Newfoundlanders are, in economic terms, contributing so much more than they are to the Canadian economy.
Canadians in Ontario and Alberta must feel like they’re on unemployment insurance with Newfoundlanders paying the bill. Quebecers and Maritimers must feel they are on welfare with Newfoundlanders paying the bill.
In economic terms each Newfoundlander is now worth four Canadians from other provinces.
It’s becoming embarrassing.
And what is just as embarrassing is that historically, since 1949, this province, on average, on a per capita basis, has led all other Canadians in contributions to the Canadian economy.
Of course, the billion dollars of power that we export indirectly to the United States shows up as Quebec’s power on the official figures. That’s one billion dollars of exports that must be taken from the Quebec column and counted as coming from this province.
Oh yeah, says the economist, we lead every other province on a per person basis with just over a half a million people - of course Newfoundlanders and Labradorians lead the rest of Canada. Also we have always exported practically everything we produce - wood, pulp and paper, minerals, fish, and now oil. That is why we have always contributed more to the Canadian economy than any other Canadians on a per capita basis.
And that is why some people sometimes suggest that we would have been better off had we not joined Canada or if we were today to separate from Canada. On the economic yardstick this province is in a far better position to separate and print its own money – just like we did prior to joining Canada.
The Export Development Corporation in releasing its figures last month claimed that this province is now exporting about $4 billion of crude oil to the United States. It points out that Statistics Canada figures, used by the provincial government, are incorrect.
Those incorrect figures, used by provincial governments and Ottawa, show that most of our exports of crude oil are going to other Canadian provinces for refining. The Export Development Corporation claims in their end of July report that in fact most of our crude is being shipped to the United States for refining and not to Canadian refineries. I believe the Export Development Corporation.
Together with the power through Quebec, these adjustments are necessary to get to the truth about our exports to foreign nations.
Some of our offshore crude and all of Voisey’s Bay nickel are shipped within Canada for processing and cannot be counted in values of exports. Voisey’s Bay nickel and Duck Pond copper and zinc, and iron ore, will lead exports of minerals next year. Where is Duck Pond you might ask? It’s around Trout Pond, which is next to a smaller pond called Goose Pond.
The Newfoundland separatist makes a valid point in saying that if we were not a part of Canada all of our exports would be to foreign nations.
Then look at the fantastic economic position we would be in.
Maybe Major Peter Cashin and Malcolm Hollett were right in 1948.
The only thing missing today is the quality of politician we had years ago - from the records of the National Convention and Hansard, quality politicians like Peter Cashin, Malcolm Hollett, Gordon Bradley, Joey Smallwood, James Chaulker, Dr. Jim McGrath, Dr. Fred Rowe, Bill Rowe, Charlie Ballam, C. Max Lane, Ed Roberts, John Crosbie, James McGrath, Clyde Wells, Nathaniel Noel, Bill Marshall, Dr. Noel Murphy, Ambrose Peddle, Jack Pickersgill, Dr. Frecker, Tom Hickey, John Lundrigan, Jim Morgan etc. etc.
Yes, today we do have some outstanding politicians, like Danny Williams, but they are like hen’s teeth – they’re hard to find.

15 years ago @ Angry in the Great Whi... - Mike Duffy and the Sen... · 2 replies · +1 points

What you conveniently or ignorantly omit to mention is that this isn't about equalization this is a breaking of a bilateral agreement between two provinces in this federation and their federal government.

An agreement that corrected a contravention of the constitution which states provinces own, control, and are to be the primary beneficiaries of their own non-renewable resources. Otherwise Upper/Lower canada own, control, and are the primary beneficiaries of NL's non-renewable resources to the tune of 66% and NL get's 1.5%.

Hence my pointing out canada is nothing short of Per Capita Colonialism.
Democratic Discrimination by all of the national PROXY parties of the Upper/Lower canada majority against the minority provinces.
Tyranny of the majority by all of the national PROXY parties of the Upper/Lower canada majority.

The Supreme Court of Canada basically said that the 'only' reason the off-shore could be considered to be owned by Canada is because of third-party international law. The court actually said that the status of these resources is very much in the hands of NL. They demonstrated their meaning by saying, and I paraphrase, 'not-with-standing international laws, NL brought those resources into Canada, and NL can take them back out'.

So in response to this the Atlantic Accord compromise was reached. In that deal the rest of Canada gets to suck the teat of yet more of our resources. Harper has twice unilaterally violated that compromise agreement in order to suck a little more out of NL's share. Talk about bumming off the poor!