Yeah, there is a plot all right.... Buy it ain't to build nukes with 20% enriched uranium... The plot is more likely to create uninformed concern and hysteria within the U.S. and the international community to pressure Iran to forgo it's "inalienable rights" among which is the right to enrich Uranium and process fuel which signatories to the NPT enjoy... Or to foment a military response to protect the current status Quo of Israel hegemony in the Eastern Med and nearby.. Jason bangs the hammer down hard on this latest FARCE.... This latest provocation is akin to the mushroom cloud deceptions of fearmongering by the last clutch of liars and murderers to infest out highest offices of governance...

Oh, "O".... Please say it isn't so....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Z.I.R. It probably has more 2do with the renewal of the patriot act..... Gotta B safe...!!! & a nice false flag a few weeks B4 it expires is the answer by the third reich playbook.............

Yes a trap..!! Saddam made a tape of April Glaspie saying ... yaa, no problem [to the U.S.] Go for it...

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ARTICLE...

"APRIL GLASPIE TRANSCRIPT

Yes, remember April Glaspie and her amazing stint at Middle East diplomacy?

Saddam-Glaspie meeting

Transcript of Meeting Between Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie. - July 25, 1990 (Eight days before the August 2, 1990 Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait)

July 25, 1990 - Presidential Palace - Baghdad

U.S. Ambassador Glaspie - I have direct instructions from President Bush to improve our relations with Iraq. We have considerable sympathy for your quest for higher oil prices, the immediate cause of your confrontation with Kuwait. (pause) As you know, I lived here for years and admire your extraordinary efforts to rebuild your country. We know you need funds. We understand that, and our opinion is that you should have the opportunity to rebuild your country. (pause) We can see that you have deployed massive numbers of troops in the south. Normally that would be none of our business, but when this happens in the context of your threat s against Kuwait, then it would be reasonable for us to be concerned. For this reason, I have received an instruction to ask you, in the spirit of friendship - not confrontation - regarding your intentions: Why are your troops massed so very close to Kuwait's borders?

Saddam Hussein - As you know, for years now I have made every effort to reach a settlement on our dispute with Kuwait. There is to be a meeting in two days; I am prepared to give negotiations only this one more brief chance. (pause) When we (the Iraqis) meet (with the Kuwaitis) and we see there is hope, then nothing will happen. But if we are unable to find a solution, then it will be natural that Iraq will not accept death.

U.S. Ambassador Glaspie - What solutions would be acceptab le?

Saddam Hussein - If we could keep the whole of the Shatt al Arab - our strategic goal in our war with Iran - we will make concessions (to the Kuwaitis). But, if we are forced to choose between keeping half of the Shatt and the whole of Iraq (i.e., in Saddam s view, including Kuwait ) then we will give up all of the Shatt to defend our claims on Kuwait to keep the whole of Iraq in the shape we wish it to be. (pause) What is the United States' opinion on this?

U.S. Ambassador Glaspie - We have no opinion on your Arab - Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary (of State James) Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the 1960's, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America. (Saddam smiles)

On August 2, 1990, Saddam's massed troops invade and occupy Kuwait. _____

Baghdad, September 2, 1990, U.S. Embassy

One month later, British journalists obtain the the above tape and transcript of the Saddam - Glaspie meeting of July 29, 1990. Astounded, they confront Ms. Glaspie as she leaves the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

Journalist 1 - Are the transcripts (holding them up) correct, Madam Ambassador?(Ambassador Glaspie does not respond)

Journalist 2 - You knew Saddam was going to invade (Kuwait ) but you didn't warn him not to. You didn't tell him America would defend Kuwait. You told him the opposite - that America was not associated with Kuwait.

Journalist 1 - You encouraged this aggression - his invasi on. What were you thinking?

U.S. Ambassador Glaspie - Obviously, I didn't think, and nobody else did, that the Iraqis were going to take all of Kuwait.

Journalist 1 - You thought he was just going to take some of it? But, how could you? Saddam told you that, if negotiations failed , he would give up his Iran (Shatt al Arab waterway) goal for the Whole of Iraq, in the shape we wish it to be. You know that includes Kuwait, which the Iraqis have always viewed as an historic part of their country!

Journalist 1 - American green-lighted the invasion. At a minimum, you admit signaling Saddam that some aggression was okay - that the U.S. would not oppose a grab of the al-Rumeilah oil field, the disputed border strip and the Gulf Islands (including Bubiyan) - the territories claimed by Iraq?

(Ambassador Glaspie says nothing as a limousine door closed behind her and the car drives off.)

_____

To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed. Information last updated on: 02/09/96 "

What more proof could anyone want..?? It was an inside baseball set up.......

AAAHHHHH.... Yes the ship of the IsraeloAmericana slips effortlessly from theft to theft, war to war

genocide to genocide with the slightest of wake piloted by the good captain Exxon Texas....... Where

the water is really money that floats the vessel.... and the oil calms the sea of seething...... There are

dangers to be forgone and dangers to be forthwarted. Or like Valdez to be embraced in the intoxication

of hubris..... Of Iran & China... How much to borrow from Peter to throttle Paul... Follow the MONEY

2.3 TRILLION missing on Sept. 10, 2001 ** 18 billion in cash on pallets sent to IRAQ *** Dov Zakhein

They use OUR tax dollars to bribe OUR politicians, spy on US.... It is because G-d is on their side......

THE G-d of MONEY..........

Did South Vietnam implement conscription during the conflict with the North..??

All you need, is to ask yourself, If THEY invaded here....sent drones here to kill those that resisted their invasion, would you help them..?? Or would you help your countrymen who resisted?? You know the answer....and your answer is what will happen...

WAKE UP... Mr.Brennan.... Better yet have a PUBLIC TALK with Kurt Haskell.....unless the panties guy is YOUR guy.......... Otherwise, take the shortest path to the truth of what actually happened.... Good for us, ....... Good for you....

Does this mean that we will have to wait 30 years to find out where her TWO missing CHILDREN are?? Too bad that antiwar.com did NOT follow the trial and attendant efforts to destroy the woman... Were her teeth removed?? Where are her Children..?? Where was she for the FIVE missing years..?? More shame on Obama.......

** !! CRAZY !! !! INSANE !! ** Are there so FEW Afghans that did overt crimes, that the GOV has these hapless nobodys as their souvenirs.. But the part I like BEST, is how the HOPE Man, Pres. "O" [becoming Pres. "0" 4me] has gone along with the policy of his predecessor the Moron Prince....

FrankLau, If the Uighurs had committed crimes you can rest assured the Chinese would have trumpeted such info to the corners of the world....... They are innocent of any crime against the U.S., the country that has them in custody. If some other state accused them of any crime, the bush bastards that purchased them and put them in their gulags, would have put it on billboards.....