IntenseDebate - LLinLa

12 years ago @ The Heritage Foundry - Ted Cruz Makes the Cas... · 6 replies · +19 points

Interesting use of "no-brainer." It would seem to me that Progressives by the millions could latch on to this proposal since they clearly meet the suggested minimum standard for the program. Barely . . .

15 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Clinton departs for tw... · 0 replies · +4 points

In this age of digital media, wouldn't it be more prudent to do a GoToMeeting or LogMeIn whiteboard presentation since most of what she says is BS anyway? I can't wait until 2012 when the "N" word associations tangle with each other over the choice of President (NAACP vs. NOW). It's no wonder the Mayans' calendar ran out on Dec 21, 2012. Even they could see it coming to a head!

15 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Randy Quaid, wife clai... · 0 replies · +1 points

Does anybody have the address of the Canadian Refugee Assn. where I can send a donation to keep them?

15 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Israel to blame if tal... · 0 replies · +3 points

So, in other words, President Abbas, you are most interested in Peace Talks failing than you are about peace. "Ishmael" speaks, huh?

15 years ago @ CSMonitor: Money - Happy Meals: Does McDo... · 0 replies · +8 points

Has anybody noticed that the Nanny States (or Cities) are the ones is serious financial trouble not to mention the entire state of California & New York? They should be allowed to ban or tax themselves right out of existence without bailouts if that's what they want. No bailouts, just self-fulfillment in action.

15 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Scientists find sea sp... · 1 reply · +19 points

That's just plain mean and disgusting, Joe! What has a sponge ever done to you to deserve that comparison!? They just sit there absorbing water passively. Unlike the "spongers" that can vote actively.

15 years ago @ Big Government - Long Hot Summer Begins... · 0 replies · +3 points

There must be some mistake! Is he a violent, fascist Teabagger? Is he a racist Republican? Sheeple on the Left, please read this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projec.... Then ask yourself why terms like "Nazi," "bigot," and many others are "projected" onto the virtually peace-loving realists rightward and ask yourself who was the party most against the Civil Rights Act instead of blindly accepting a party intent on rewriting (projecting) a new version of who are the fascist control frieks who tell sheeple what they want to hear then do something totally different.

Attacking a college student for asking a simple question he should be proud to acknowledge instead of goosestepping to to a party mantra!?

Read this Conressman: N-O-V-E-M-B-E-R 2-0-1-0. Pleasant nightmares until then.

16 years ago @ Big Government - Rep. Andre Carson: Tea... · 0 replies · +7 points

I only slightly disagree with you, Scooter. But I do think this guy's picture could illustrate the "moron" entry in Webster. The man-no matter his skin color--evidently is either 1) not too bright 2) A Democrat 3) Sorry for being redundant in 1) & 2) choices.

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Immigration debate sha... · 0 replies · +1 points

More focus needs to be put on those countries which are compelling its citizenry to flee in fear or hardship from their own duly constituted territories instead of wasting time blaming the United States citizenry of being bigots. I challenge you to leave your front and backdoor open to allow anyone who feels the need to spend a few years in your home free passage without restriction and then fund them so a politician can get re-elected. You can bet the officials' doors are deadbolted steadfastly, their property patrolled 24/7 with armed guards and our tax dollars go to protect them lest some undesirables happen to wander in along with a majority of good people. It's really a very simple thing to ask for our American protection without being labelled as racists, xenphobes, whatever. It's protection against the deterioration of a system of law which affords legal immigration without restriction. Anarchy and lawlessness is what we are asked to accept now.

16 years ago @ Breitbart.com - Immigration debate sha... · 0 replies · +1 points

Laws were meant to prevent individuals on either side of an issue from doing things that would hurt them or invade their sovereignty. What would not be good would be to mirror Mexican law and practices and abandon our American System of compassion for the downtrodden. But to carte blanche allow people to continue breaking our existing laws made long before Mexican immigration was an issue in this land supposedly governed by the rule of Law at the expense and health of the 288 million "immigrants" who follow the appropriate rules to achieve the dream of freedom.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with LLinLa

People I'm following

LLinLa