Jubal, you haven't been listening to me!

I have. The problem is you are making uninformed assumptions about what I think and what Red County is. I would encourage you to think for yourself, and not turn that function over to J & K.

Whoever voted for the tax increase needs to be recalled.

Just to be sure you are on the reality page, tell me which GOP legislators voted for the tax increase?

Ok, Winston:

"But in politics, fury without purpose and intelligent guidance diffuses and dissipates over time."

From the above comment, I can see that you have no idea what has just happened to you. Since I was At the event, let me give you my take. It’s obvious that John and Ken had no idea that the turnout would be so high.

Alrighty -- where did I say the Fullerton rally did NOT draw a huge crowd? In fact, I praised J & K for the rally.

Although Mike W pointed out my comment, he never actually rebutted, or even responded, to it. J & K should be commended for fanning the flames of voter anger of the tax hikes, and urging them to oppose Props. 1A-F. But on the downside, they lurch off into blind alleys like wanting to recall a freshman GOP Assemblyman who OPPOSED the tax increase.

Perhaps Mike W. can explain how that makes future tax increases LESS likely, as opposed to J & K urging their listeners to help defeat Democrats in marginal seats -- like Lou Correa. After all, EVERY Democrat voted for the tax increase. If J & K send their listeners into many different directions, rather than focusing on things they can successfully impact like recalling Adams, they're more likely to acheive results.

That's just common sense.

One example is the good old Abortion litmus test for your candidates. You have offended an entire generation of Women!

That's just ignorant. For one thing, it assumes that all women are pro-choice -- which they most defintiely are not.

Secondly, perhaps Mike W can recite for me some prominent pro-life Democratic politicians? I doubt he can name three, which is because the abortion litmus test is enforced int eh Democratic Party, where as the Republican PArty is far more tolerant of opposing viewpoints on that issue.

Satisfied, Winston? or do you have similar wisdom to share?

The difference, of course, being that my analogy has validity, while yours doesn't.

Maybe if you weren't seeing such a dark shade of red, you could read my comments and actually comprehend what I was saying.

1) Lou Correa is not in a gerrymandered district. You must be a J & K listener. Correa is more vulnerable than Miller by a mile.

2) What must Miller do to satisfy your misguided bloodlust?

3)0 No obscenity or personal attacks are allowed on this blog, so your comment has been deleted. if you break those rules again, you'll be banned.

Aaron:

I agree with you when you point out that John and Ken are disingenuous -- to put it mildly -- to stake their tax-hike-conspiracy claims on the word of Anthony Adams, whom they otherwise say (correctly) has no credibility.

But don't go down this fatwa/Miller-is-Jewish road. Don't ask me to believe Miller's religion has anything to do with their counter-productive attacks against him, because there is no reason to believe it. What you're doing here is precisely what the Left does to Republicans. it's a reverse Maxine Waters, and should be beneath us.

Let's stick to the high road, here.

Furthermore, there were eyewitnesses to what happened.

And I have given Marcario every opportunity to publicly address this, but she has chosen not to post a comment, or return my call or e-mail requesting comment.

No, you made a personal attack, even if you are now trying to back track and attach qualifiers to what you said.

And now you've gone and violated the rules again -- aren't you supposed to be a lawyer or something? Adios.

You made personal attacks, John Galt.