The Neocons and their chicken hawk supporters' rabid "all-war-all-the-time" foreign policy is substantially based on the idea that we have to
kill the radical Muslims whereever they are. Never mind the fact that the more countries we occupy the more recruits our enemies get.

This militaristic solution is a Cro-Magnon view that's oblivious to the fact that whether this country ultimately enshrines Shariah Law in the place of our Constitution (which is the driving fear here, let's face it) is not going to be decided by bullets, bombs or water boards. The battle against militant Islamists needs to be fought in the bedroom! That's right. It's the demographics, Stupid!

Our adversaries are winning the population war by having large families inside Europe and the U.S., while all us Christians (and Christians in Name Only) are having only 1.5 child per family thru our culture of birth control, abortion and homosexuality. Meanwhile, we borrow billions from Japan to defend Japan (and Korea and Britain...) and borrow hundreds of billions more from China to "build democracy" in Iraq and pre-industrial Afghanistan!

By the way Billie, unlike RP, you never served in the U.S. military, did you? I didn't think so.

The primary reason people disagree with Ron Paul's foreign policy is because they are concerned that he will not support our main Mideast ally, Israel. If we ignore for a moment the mostly moral obligations to defend our long term ally and the religious obligations compelling the evangelical right and look solely at the geo-strategic reasons for supporting Israel, we see that mideast oil is it.

That's why a foreign policy pragmatist would support her. We need to secure Mideast oil because of our self-loathing, Climate Change-crippled energy policy that robs us of our energy independence. But even if this were somehow a defensible reason to invade Iraq (and now Iran), what has the neo-Cons' war in Iraq done for the Israelis lately?

Let's see, it's inflamed all of her enemies and served as a powerful, 9-year recruitment campaign that radicalizes new armies of gullible, jobless young Muslims and funnels them into al Queda, Taliban and other terrorist organizations. It's reshaped the political landscape of the last 50 years so that in the space of one year we now have an unbroken arc of militant Islamists surging toward political power across North Africa and South Asia from Tunisia to Pakistan and beyond. It's caused former allied bulwarks like Turkey and Egypt to make the transition from our friends to our foes at lightning speed.

Clearly, Isreal has never been more threatened in her half century-plus existence. So if the neo-conservative "Anybody but Paul" Party is Israel's friend, I shudder to think what her enemy would do for her. Certainly, Ron Paul would be no match for them -- even if he did wish her ill.

OK children, we all had fun but play time is up! The video was a scam and the actors dressing up as Orthodox Israeli Jews saying idiotic things like "We don't have any problem with the Islamic terrorists" were at pains to avoid busting out laughing. I give their acting a C+ but I give the level of basic comprehension and political savvy of posters on this thread an F-. The OWS people and the Tea Partiers BOTH abhor the corporate welfarism that bails out Wall Street while it fleeces Main Street. I marched with the Tea Party on 9/12/09 and I disagree with OWS on everything else. The video's Emcee shilling for the 'Anybody but Paul" crowd who OWN Wall Street is preying on your intellectual childishness. You'll never beat the grown ups if you don't wise up.